Suppr超能文献

与正弦光栅相比,非周期性图案的可见性。

Visibility of aperiodic patterns compared with that of sinusoidal gratings.

作者信息

Campbell F W, Carpenter R H, Levinson J Z

出版信息

J Physiol. 1969 Oct;204(2):283-98. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008913.

Abstract
  1. Using experimental curves relating the threshold contrast of sinusoidal grating patterns to their spatial frequency, the expected threshold contrast curves for three aperiodic patterns, viz. a single half-cycle sinusoid bar, a single full-cycle sinusoid bar, and the boundary between an extended sinusoidal grating and a 50% grey surround, are calculated. In this calculation the assumption is made that the system is linear near the threshold.2. Experiments are described in which the actual threshold contrast curves are determined for these aperiodic patterns by three observers. The patterns were generated on the face of an oscilloscope and could be varied in size and contrast.3. These experimental curves agree well with the predictions in the high frequency region (i.e. above about 10 c/deg), but below this various complicating factors restrict the validity of the calculations.4. Thus there is no reason to suppose that a linear theory cannot be used to predict visibility of aperiodic patterns near threshold.
摘要
  1. 利用将正弦光栅图案的阈值对比度与其空间频率相关联的实验曲线,计算了三种非周期图案的预期阈值对比度曲线,即单个半周期正弦条、单个全周期正弦条以及扩展正弦光栅与50%灰度背景之间的边界。在该计算中,假设系统在阈值附近是线性的。

  2. 描述了实验,其中由三名观察者确定这些非周期图案的实际阈值对比度曲线。图案在示波器屏幕上生成,并且可以在大小和对比度上变化。

  3. 这些实验曲线在高频区域(即高于约10周/度)与预测结果吻合良好,但在该频率以下,各种复杂因素限制了计算的有效性。

  4. 因此,没有理由认为线性理论不能用于预测非周期图案在阈值附近的可见性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e870/1351553/e3ca53c7ebe5/jphysiol01070-0042-a.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验