Simon H J, Axline S G, Vosti K L
Calif Med. 1965 Dec;103(6):395-9.
Of 655 bacterial strains isolated in a routine clinical diagnostic laboratory, 564 (86 per cent) were found sensitive to cephalothin by disk sensitivity test. However, the fraction of sensitive Gram-negative bacilli and enterococci declined sharply at concentrations approximating those obtained in serum after the usual recommended dosages. Gram-positive bacteria remained sensitive throughout the entire range of testing concentrations. Unless very high dosages are used, cephalothin cannot be considered a broad-spectrum antibacterial agent for use while cultures are pending. Even with very high dosages all strains of Pseudomonas spp. and significant fractions of other Gram-negative bacillary species remain resistant to cephalothin. If used alone, the high potency cephalothin disk may yield inadequate information and should be supplemented by a lower potency disk, standardized measurements of zone diameters, or a screening plate.
在一家常规临床诊断实验室分离出的655株细菌菌株中,通过纸片药敏试验发现564株(86%)对头孢噻吩敏感。然而,在接近常规推荐剂量后血清中所达到的浓度时,敏感的革兰氏阴性杆菌和肠球菌比例急剧下降。革兰氏阳性菌在整个测试浓度范围内均保持敏感。除非使用非常高的剂量,在培养结果待出期间,头孢噻吩不能被视为一种广谱抗菌剂。即使使用非常高的剂量,所有假单胞菌属菌株以及相当一部分其他革兰氏阴性杆菌菌株仍对头孢噻吩耐药。如果单独使用,高效力的头孢噻吩纸片可能提供的信息不足,应辅以低效力纸片、区域直径的标准化测量或筛选平板。