Gordon P C, Wanklin J M, Harvey N H, Hatcher G H
Can Med Assoc J. 1966 Dec 10;95(24):1228-36.
Employing the principles of progressive patient care and using data obtained from charts, nurses and resident physicians, 265 patients on the wards of a teaching hospital were classified into one of six optimal levels of care by the resident physicians and also by an outside observer. It was assumed that facilities for the three alternatives to general hospital care, i.e. long-term hospital care, nursing care and sheltered care, were available in the community. It was also assumed that socio-economic factors presented no barrier to hospital discharge.The outside observer allocated 96 patients, approximately one-third, to the alternative facilities outside the general hospital. Those factors found to have statistically significant effects on assigned levels of care were the diagnoses, length of stay, region of residence, bed status, extent of nursing care, hospital service and discharge status. The residents allocated 60 patients, approximately one-fifth, to alternative facilities.The extent of agreement between the residents and the outside observer reached 81% for those to alternate versus general hospital care.This method could be used by nurses and residents to screen out those most suitable for care in alternate facilities.
运用渐进式患者护理原则,并利用从病历、护士和住院医师处获得的数据,教学医院病房的265名患者被住院医师以及一名外部观察者分为六个最佳护理级别之一。假设社区中可提供综合医院护理的三种替代方案的设施,即长期医院护理、护理服务和庇护性护理。还假设社会经济因素不会成为出院的障碍。外部观察者将96名患者(约三分之一)分配到综合医院以外的替代设施。发现对指定护理级别有统计学显著影响的因素包括诊断、住院时间、居住地区、床位状态、护理程度、医院服务和出院状态。住院医师将60名患者(约五分之一)分配到替代设施。对于那些选择替代护理而非综合医院护理的患者,住院医师和外部观察者之间的一致程度达到了81%。护士和住院医师可以使用这种方法筛选出最适合在替代设施中接受护理的患者。