• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[哮喘和慢性支气管炎中气道阻塞的可逆性(作者译)]

[Reversibility of airway obstruction in asthma and chronic bronchitis (author transl)].

作者信息

Kabondo P, Orehek J

出版信息

Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir. 1977 Nov-Dec;13(6):829-36.

PMID:597641
Abstract

Our purpose was to determine whether, in patients with airway obstruction, the change in the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) which occurs after a bronchodilator drug, is helpful in differentiating asthma from chronic bronchitis. Two groups of patients (48 with asthma and 42 with chronic bronchitis) having a comparable level of initial airway obstruction were selected according to clinical criteria. After salbutamol (200 microgram inhaled) the number of subjects showing a change in FEV1 of at least 20 percent of its initial value or 10 percent of its predicted value was significantly greater (p less than 0.01) in the asthmatic than in the bronchitic group. Lesser changes in FEV1 did not significantly separate the two groups. When the changes in FEV1 were expressed as percentages of both initial and predicted values, the number of positive responses increased in the asthmatic group. However, there were still 20 asthmatics with little or no change in FEV1 after salbutamol who could not be distinguished from the patients with chronic bronchitis. From these data we conclude that, in patients with airway obstruction, a large bronchodilator-induced change in FEV1 strongly suggests the diagnosis of asthma but that the presence of "irreversible" airway obstruction does not disprove it.

摘要

我们的目的是确定在气道阻塞患者中,支气管扩张剂用药后一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)的变化是否有助于鉴别哮喘与慢性支气管炎。根据临床标准,选择了两组初始气道阻塞程度相当的患者(48例哮喘患者和42例慢性支气管炎患者)。吸入沙丁胺醇(200微克)后,FEV1变化至少达到其初始值的20%或预测值的10%的哮喘患者人数显著多于(p<0.01)慢性支气管炎组。FEV1较小的变化并不能显著区分这两组。当FEV1的变化以初始值和预测值的百分比表示时,哮喘组的阳性反应数量增加。然而,仍有20例哮喘患者在吸入沙丁胺醇后FEV1变化很小或无变化,无法与慢性支气管炎患者区分开来。从这些数据我们得出结论,在气道阻塞患者中,支气管扩张剂引起的FEV1大幅变化强烈提示哮喘诊断,但“不可逆”气道阻塞的存在并不能排除哮喘诊断。

相似文献

1
[Reversibility of airway obstruction in asthma and chronic bronchitis (author transl)].[哮喘和慢性支气管炎中气道阻塞的可逆性(作者译)]
Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir. 1977 Nov-Dec;13(6):829-36.
2
Diagnostic value of reversibility of chronic airway obstruction to separate asthma from chronic bronchitis: a statistical approach.
Eur Respir J. 1989 Jun;2(6):497-505.
3
Acute bronchodilator response has limited value in differentiating bronchial asthma from COPD.急性支气管扩张剂反应在区分支气管哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病方面价值有限。
J Asthma. 2005 Jun;42(5):367-72. doi: 10.1081/JAS-62992.
4
[Bronchodilator response in elderly patients].
Medicina (B Aires). 2001;61(3):257-61.
5
Comparison of bronchodilator responsiveness in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.哮喘与慢性阻塞性肺疾病中支气管扩张剂反应性的比较。
Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 2002 Apr-Jun;44(2):91-7.
6
Asthma and chronic bronchitis. Can family physicians predict rates of progression?哮喘与慢性支气管炎。家庭医生能否预测病情进展速率?
Can Fam Physician. 1995 Nov;41:1868-76.
7
[The bronchodilator effect of aerosol beta-2-mimetic and anticholinergic agents in patients with chronic bronchitis].
Rev Mal Respir. 1990;7(1):59-63.
8
Persistence and new onset of asthma and chronic bronchitis evaluated longitudinally in a community population sample of adults.在成年社区人群样本中对哮喘和慢性支气管炎的持续性及新发情况进行纵向评估。
Arch Intern Med. 1995 Jul 10;155(13):1393-9.
9
Reversal of bronchial obstruction with bi-level positive airway pressure and nebulization in patients with acute asthma.双水平气道正压通气联合雾化吸入治疗急性哮喘患者支气管阻塞的逆转
J Asthma. 2009 May;46(4):356-61. doi: 10.1080/02770900902718829.
10
[Exercise test in the asthmatic patient. Study of 75 patients].[哮喘患者的运动试验。75例患者的研究]
Nouv Presse Med. 1975 Nov 15;4(39):2789-92.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of bronchodilator response in various spirometric patterns.不同肺量计模式下支气管扩张剂反应的评估。
Tanaffos. 2013;12(2):28-33.