• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哮喘与慢性阻塞性肺疾病中支气管扩张剂反应性的比较。

Comparison of bronchodilator responsiveness in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

作者信息

Chhabra Sunil K, Bhatnagar Shaleen

机构信息

Department of Cardiorespiratory Physiology, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi, India.

出版信息

Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 2002 Apr-Jun;44(2):91-7.

PMID:12026258
Abstract

While asthmatics are known to have a greater response to bronchodilators than patients of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), whether the pattern of response also differs has not been explored. Forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1st second (FEV1) were measured before and 20 minutes after inhalation of 200 microg salbutamol in patients of bronchial asthma (n=133) and (COPD) (n=116). Three types of responses (defined as > or = 12% and 200 ml increase in FEV1 or FVC) were identified: increase in (i) only FVC (FVC response), (ii) only FEV1 (FEV1 response), and, (iii) both FVC and FEV1 (double response). The mean +/- SEM absolute increase in FEV1 was significantly greater in asthmatics (307+/-17ml) as compared to 120+/-12 ml in COPD patients (p<0.0001). On the other hand, the increase in FVC was not different in the two groups (296+/-22 ml and 230+/-24 ml, respectively, p>0.05). The proportion of subjects showing a > or = 200 ml increase in FEV1 was greater among asthmatics as compared to COPD (p<0.0001) but the proportions showing a > or = 200 ml in FVC were similar (p>0.05). All the three types of responses were observed in asthmatics with a double response being the commonest. In COPD, an FVC response was the predominant response while the FEV1 response was rare. Multinomial logistic regression revealed that younger subjects (below 45 years) were more likely to have a double or exclusive FEV1 response. Greater severity of obstruction was associated with higher odds for each of the three responses, the odds being especially very high for an exclusive FEV1 response. The odds for a double response and an exclusive FEV1 response were significantly increased in asthmatics as compared to COPD. For FVC response, age category and disease were not significant determinants. It was concluded that bronchodilator responsiveness in asthma and COPD differs not only quantitatively but also in the pattern.

摘要

虽然已知哮喘患者对支气管扩张剂的反应比慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者更大,但反应模式是否也不同尚未得到探讨。在133例支气管哮喘患者和116例COPD患者中,测量了吸入200微克沙丁胺醇前及吸入后20分钟的用力肺活量(FVC)和第1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)。确定了三种类型的反应(定义为FEV1或FVC增加≥12%且增加200毫升):(i)仅FVC增加(FVC反应),(ii)仅FEV1增加(FEV1反应),以及(iii)FVC和FEV1均增加(双重反应)。哮喘患者FEV1的平均±标准误绝对增加量(307±17毫升)显著高于COPD患者的120±12毫升(p<0.0001)。另一方面,两组的FVC增加量无差异(分别为296±22毫升和230±24毫升,p>0.05)。与COPD相比,哮喘患者中FEV1增加≥200毫升的受试者比例更高(p<0.0001),但FVC增加≥200毫升的比例相似(p>0.05)。在哮喘患者中观察到了所有三种类型的反应,其中双重反应最为常见。在COPD中,FVC反应是主要反应,而FEV1反应很少见。多项逻辑回归显示,较年轻的受试者(45岁以下)更有可能出现双重或单纯的FEV1反应。阻塞程度越严重,三种反应中每种反应的几率越高,单纯FEV1反应的几率尤其高。与COPD相比,哮喘患者双重反应和单纯FEV1反应的几率显著增加。对于FVC反应,年龄类别和疾病不是显著的决定因素。得出的结论是,哮喘和COPD中支气管扩张剂反应性不仅在数量上不同,而且在模式上也不同。

相似文献

1
Comparison of bronchodilator responsiveness in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.哮喘与慢性阻塞性肺疾病中支气管扩张剂反应性的比较。
Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 2002 Apr-Jun;44(2):91-7.
2
[FEV1 after three years of observation in patients with bronchial asthma and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].[支气管哮喘患者和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者三年观察后的第一秒用力呼气容积]
Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 2005;73(2):142-7.
3
The volumetric response to bronchodilators in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病对支气管扩张剂的容量反应
COPD. 2008 Jun;5(3):147-52. doi: 10.1080/15412550802092928.
4
Acute bronchodilator response has limited value in differentiating bronchial asthma from COPD.急性支气管扩张剂反应在区分支气管哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病方面价值有限。
J Asthma. 2005 Jun;42(5):367-72. doi: 10.1081/JAS-62992.
5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is missed in asthmatics in specialty care in Trinidad, West Indies.在西印度群岛特立尼达的专科护理中,哮喘患者的慢性阻塞性肺疾病被漏诊。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007 Sep;11(9):1026-32.
6
Beta2-adrenergic receptor haplotype and bronchodilator response to salbutamol in patients with acute exacerbations of COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重患者的β2肾上腺素能受体单倍型与沙丁胺醇的支气管扩张反应
Med Sci Monit. 2008 Aug;14(8):CR392-8.
7
Modulation of operational lung volumes with the use of salbutamol in COPD patients accomplishing upper limbs exercise tests.在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者完成上肢运动试验时使用沙丁胺醇对有效肺容积的调节作用。
Respir Med. 2009 Feb;103(2):251-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.08.018. Epub 2008 Oct 19.
8
Measures of bronchodilator response of FEV, FVC and SVC in a Swedish general population sample aged 50-64 years, the SCAPIS Pilot Study.在瑞典50-64岁普通人群样本中,对FEV、FVC和SVC进行支气管扩张剂反应的测量,即SCAPIS试点研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Mar 22;12:973-980. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S127336. eCollection 2017.
9
Assessment of bronchodilator response through changes in lung volumes in chronic airflow obstruction.通过慢性气流受限患者肺容积变化评估支气管扩张剂反应
Medicina (B Aires). 2003;63(5):377-82.
10
Does lobectomy for lung cancer in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease affect lung function? A multicenter national study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者行肺癌肺叶切除术会影响肺功能吗?一项全国性多中心研究。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Dec;130(6):1616-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.06.049.

引用本文的文献

1
Gulf Asthma Diagnosis and Management in Adults: Expert Review and Recommendations.成人海湾地区哮喘的诊断与管理:专家综述与建议
Open Respir Med J. 2022 Jul 18;16:e187430642205230. doi: 10.2174/18743064-v16-e2205230. eCollection 2022.
2
Combined Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second and Forced Vital Capacity Bronchodilator Response, Exacerbations, and Mortality in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.一秒用力呼气容积与用力肺活量的支气管扩张剂反应、慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重和死亡率的关系。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Jul;16(7):826-835. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201809-601OC.
3
Use of Symptoms Scores, Spirometry, and Other Pulmonary Function Testing for Asthma Monitoring.
使用症状评分、肺量计及其他肺功能测试进行哮喘监测。
Front Pediatr. 2019 Mar 5;7:54. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00054. eCollection 2019.
4
Airflow obstruction: is it asthma or is it COPD?气流阻塞:是哮喘还是慢性阻塞性肺疾病?
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Nov 30;11:3007-3013. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S54927. eCollection 2016.
5
Clinical application of spirometry in asthma: Why, when and how often?肺量计在哮喘中的临床应用:为何、何时以及多久应用一次?
Lung India. 2015 Nov-Dec;32(6):635-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.168139.
6
Author's Response.作者回复。
Lung India. 2013 Jul;30(3):225.
7
Test of reversibility of airway obstruction: Time for a review?气道阻塞可逆性测试:是时候进行回顾了吗?
Lung India. 2013 Jan;30(1):3-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.106118.
8
Assessing respiratory morbidity through pollution status and meteorological conditions for Delhi.
Environ Monit Assess. 2006 Mar;114(1-3):489-504. doi: 10.1007/s10661-006-4935-3. Epub 2006 Mar 28.