Kuttler K L, Zaugg J L, Johnson L W
Am J Vet Res. 1984 Nov;45(11):2223-6.
Two Anaplasma marginale isolates, one originating in Florida (FAM) and the other from Virginia (VAM), were compared immunologically by cross-challenge exposure of 14 Anaplasma carrier cattle, 8 previously infected cattle, and 6 splenectomized carrier calves. In addition, 28 cattle vaccinated with a commercially available adjuvant killed vaccine and 22 nonvaccinated cattle were challenge exposed with either FAM or VAM. A detectable clinical response was not produced by either FAM or VAM challenge exposure in carrier and previously infected cattle; however, evidence of A marginale growth as characterized by low percentages of parasitemia and increased serum complement-fixation titers was seen in carrier cattle given a heterologous challenge organism and in previously infected cattle inoculated with either homologous or heterologous organisms. Among splenectomized calves, there was virtually no cross protection to the heterologous challenge exposure, whereas a homologous challenge failed to elicit any detectable response. Vaccinated cattle were resistant to VAM exposure, but the clinical response to FAM exposure was severe with a 47% mortality. Most of these cattle displayed typical acute anaplasmosis that was only marginally less severe than that encountered in nonvaccinated cattle.
对两株边缘无形体分离株进行了免疫学比较,一株来自佛罗里达州(FAM),另一株来自弗吉尼亚州(VAM)。用这两株分离株对14头无形体带菌牛、8头先前已感染牛和6头脾切除带菌犊牛进行交叉攻击暴露试验。此外,用市售佐剂灭活疫苗接种的28头牛和22头未接种疫苗的牛,分别用FAM或VAM进行攻击暴露试验。FAM或VAM攻击暴露均未在带菌牛和先前已感染牛中引起可检测到的临床反应;然而,在用异源攻击菌株攻击的带菌牛以及接种同源或异源菌株的先前已感染牛中,可见到以低百分比的寄生虫血症和血清补体结合滴度升高为特征的边缘无形体生长迹象。在脾切除犊牛中,对异源攻击暴露几乎没有交叉保护作用,而同源攻击未能引发任何可检测到的反应。接种疫苗的牛对VAM暴露有抵抗力,但对FAM暴露的临床反应严重,死亡率为47%。这些牛大多表现出典型的急性无形体病,其严重程度仅略低于未接种疫苗的牛。