• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管手术患者预防性抗生素治疗方案的比较。

Comparison of prophylactic antibiotic regimens in patients undergoing vascular surgery.

作者信息

Walker M, Litherland H K, Murphy J, Smith J A

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 1984 Dec;5 Suppl A:101-6. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(84)90039-2.

DOI:10.1016/0195-6701(84)90039-2
PMID:6084675
Abstract

An unacceptably high infection rate in patients undergoing vascular surgery prompted two studies on these patients. The first study confirmed the problem and described antibiotic usage which was not standardized. A second double blind randomized study compared antibiotic usage in two groups of patients, receiving vein grafts or synthetic grafts. Patients receiving vein grafts were randomized either to placebo or cefazolin 2 g 1 h pre-operatively and every 6 h for 48 h. Patients receiving synthetic grafts were randomized either to cefazolin 1 g or to cefazolin 2 g 1 h pre-operatively and every 6 h for 48 h. Four of 50 vein graft patients developed a purulent discharge. Two of these infected patients received placebo and two received the cefazolin 2 g protocol. Of 90 patients receiving a synthetic graft, four became infected. Three patients were randomized to the cefazolin 1 g protocol and one to the cefazolin 2 g protocol. No statistically significant differences were observed.

摘要

血管手术患者中出现的高得令人无法接受的感染率促使针对这些患者开展了两项研究。第一项研究证实了该问题,并描述了抗生素使用不规范的情况。第二项双盲随机研究比较了两组接受静脉移植物或合成移植物的患者的抗生素使用情况。接受静脉移植物的患者被随机分为两组,一组术前1小时接受安慰剂,另一组术前1小时接受2克头孢唑林,术后每6小时一次,共48小时。接受合成移植物的患者被随机分为两组,一组术前1小时接受1克头孢唑林,另一组术前1小时接受2克头孢唑林,术后每6小时一次,共48小时。50名接受静脉移植物的患者中有4人出现脓性分泌物。其中2名感染患者接受了安慰剂,2名接受了2克头孢唑林方案。在90名接受合成移植物的患者中,有4人感染。3名患者被随机分配到1克头孢唑林方案组,1名患者被随机分配到2克头孢唑林方案组。未观察到统计学上的显著差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of prophylactic antibiotic regimens in patients undergoing vascular surgery.血管手术患者预防性抗生素治疗方案的比较。
J Hosp Infect. 1984 Dec;5 Suppl A:101-6. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(84)90039-2.
2
Cefazolin vs moxalactam? A double-blind randomized trial of cephalosporins in head and neck surgery.头孢唑林与拉氧头孢对比?头颈部手术中头孢菌素类药物的双盲随机试验。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986 Feb;112(2):151-3. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1986.03780020031008.
3
Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in cardiovascular surgery. A prospective randomized trial comparing two day cefuroxime prophylaxis with four day cefazolin prophylaxis.心血管手术围手术期抗菌药物预防。一项前瞻性随机试验,比较头孢呋辛两日预防用药与头孢唑林四日预防用药。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1986 May-Jun;27(3):300-6.
4
Antibiotic prophylaxis in vascular surgery.血管外科中的抗生素预防
Ann Surg. 1978 Sep;188(3):283-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197809000-00003.
5
Comparative study of cefazolin, cefamandole, and vancomycin for surgical prophylaxis in cardiac and vascular operations. A double-blind randomized trial.头孢唑林、头孢孟多和万古霉素用于心脏和血管手术预防性抗菌治疗的比较研究。一项双盲随机试验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992 Nov;104(5):1423-34.
6
[A prospective, randomized comparative study between cefazolin and cefuroxime as perioperative antibiotic prevention in cardiovascular surgery].[头孢唑林与头孢呋辛作为心血管手术围手术期抗生素预防用药的前瞻性随机对照研究]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1984 Mar 3;114(9):297-303.
7
Antibiotic prophylaxis in open-heart surgery: a comparison of cefamandole, cefuroxime, and cefazolin.心脏直视手术中的抗生素预防:头孢孟多、头孢呋辛和头孢唑林的比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1988 Aug;46(2):167-71. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)65890-0.
8
Randomized, prospective comparison of first- and second-generation cephalosporins as infection prophylaxis for cardiac surgery.第一代和第二代头孢菌素用于心脏手术感染预防的随机前瞻性比较。
Am J Surg. 1993 Dec;166(6):734-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80689-0.
9
Broad spectrum antibiotics as short term prophylaxis for elective abdominal hysterectomy: comparison of mezlocillin, cefazolin and placebo.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1986 Apr;24(2):157-60. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(86)90011-1.
10
Efficacy of cefazolin, cefamandole, and gentamicin as prophylactic agents in cardiac surgery. Results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial in 1030 patients.头孢唑林、头孢孟多和庆大霉素作为心脏手术预防用药的疗效。1030例患者前瞻性、随机、双盲试验的结果。
Ann Surg. 1987 Dec;206(6):791-7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198712000-00018.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevention of infection in aortic or aortoiliac peripheral arterial reconstruction.主动脉或主-髂动脉周围动脉重建术中的感染预防
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 22;4(4):CD015192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015192.pub2.
2
Prevention of infection in arterial reconstruction.动脉重建术中的感染预防。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD003073. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003073.pub2.
3
Risk factors in vascular surgical sepsis.血管外科败血症的危险因素。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1988 May;70(3):139-43.