Suppr超能文献

浆液性积液的细胞学检查:两种略有不同制备方法的比较研究

Cytology of serous effusions: a comparative study of two slightly different preparative methods.

作者信息

Dekker A, Bupp P A

出版信息

Acta Cytol. 1976 Jul-Aug;20(4):394-9.

PMID:60862
Abstract

A prospective study of 100 serous effusions was made by two slightly different technics of smearing cells from the centrifuged sediment onto glass slides. Those made with the cotton swab had greater cell concentration and better cell morphology than matching slides prepared by the pipette-"hematologic" two-slide technic. Exclusive use of the cotton swab, therefore, is recommended in making these preparations. On follow-up, in this series of 72 patients, there was a false positive rate of zero per cent, and a false negative rate of 29%.

摘要

对100例浆液性积液进行了前瞻性研究,采用两种略有不同的技术将离心沉淀物中的细胞涂抹在载玻片上。用棉拭子制作的涂片比用移液器 - “血液学”双玻片技术制作的匹配涂片具有更高的细胞浓度和更好的细胞形态。因此,建议在制作这些涂片时仅使用棉拭子。在这72例患者的随访中,假阳性率为零,假阴性率为29%。

相似文献

5
Chromosome analysis of malignant human effusions in vivo.
Scand J Respir Dis Suppl. 1979;105:1-100.
7

引用本文的文献

2
Cytologic diagnosis of ascitic fluid in Ibadan, Nigeria.
J Natl Med Assoc. 1980 Jul;72(7):669-72.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验