• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新一代玻璃离子水门汀的体外细胞毒性

In vitro cytotoxicity of a glass ionomer cement of a new generation.

作者信息

Meryon S D, Browne R M

出版信息

Cell Biochem Funct. 1984 Jan;2(1):43-8. doi: 10.1002/cbf.290020112.

DOI:10.1002/cbf.290020112
PMID:6088110
Abstract

The new glass ionomer dental cement, ChemFil, was found to be moderately cytotoxic when freshly mixed in vitro. This was assessed by a reduction in fibroblast and macrophage counts following 24 h exposure to the material, and by alterations in enzyme levels and enzyme staining kinetics relative to control cultures. Testing of set samples of the material showed that its toxicity decreased rapidly with setting. ChemFil behaved in a manner similar to two older glass ionomers, ASPA and ChemBond, although it was generally slightly less irritant.

摘要

新型玻璃离子水门汀ChemFil在体外刚混合时具有中度细胞毒性。这是通过在接触该材料24小时后成纤维细胞和巨噬细胞数量的减少,以及相对于对照培养物的酶水平和酶染色动力学的改变来评估的。对该材料凝固样本的测试表明,其毒性随着凝固而迅速降低。ChemFil的表现与两种较老的玻璃离子水门汀ASPA和ChemBond相似,尽管它的刺激性通常略小。

相似文献

1
In vitro cytotoxicity of a glass ionomer cement of a new generation.新一代玻璃离子水门汀的体外细胞毒性
Cell Biochem Funct. 1984 Jan;2(1):43-8. doi: 10.1002/cbf.290020112.
2
Cytotoxicity of materials used in perforation repair tested using the V79 fibroblast cell line and the granulocyte-macrophage progenitor cells.使用V79成纤维细胞系和粒细胞-巨噬细胞祖细胞测试穿孔修复所用材料的细胞毒性。
Int Endod J. 2006 Jan;39(1):40-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01045.x.
3
A comparison of the in vitro cytotoxicity of two glass-ionomer cements.两种玻璃离子水门汀的体外细胞毒性比较。
J Dent Res. 1983 Jun;62(6):769-73. doi: 10.1177/00220345830620061701.
4
A comparison of the in vitro cytotoxicity of four restorative materials assessed by changes in enzyme levels in two cell types.
J Biomed Mater Res. 1982 Jul;16(4):519-28. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820160417.
5
An evaluation of the cytotoxic effects of orthodontic bonding adhesives upon a primary human oral gingival fibroblast culture and a permanent, human oral cancer-cell line.正畸粘结剂对原代人牙龈成纤维细胞培养物和人永久性口腔癌细胞系的细胞毒性作用评估。
J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63(6):814-21. doi: 10.1002/jbm.10412.
6
Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of pulp capping materials in two cell lines.两种细胞系中盖髓材料的细胞毒性和遗传毒性
Int Endod J. 2009 Mar;42(3):227-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01506.x.
7
An in vitro pulp chamber with three-dimensional cell cultures.具有三维细胞培养的体外牙髓腔。
J Endod. 1999 Jan;25(1):24-9. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80394-X.
8
Comparison of Cytotoxicity of New Nanohybrid Composite, Giomer, Glass Ionomer and Silver Reinforced Glass Ionomer using Human Gingival Fibroblast Cell Line.使用人牙龈成纤维细胞系比较新型纳米杂化复合材料、聚酸改性玻璃离子水门汀、玻璃离子水门汀和银增强玻璃离子水门汀的细胞毒性
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017;41(5):368-373. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-41.5.368.
9
In vitro evaluation of the cytotoxicity of two glass-ionomer root canal sealers.两种玻璃离子根管封闭剂细胞毒性的体外评价
J Endod. 1997 Sep;23(9):572-4. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81124-6.
10
Cytotoxicity of a calcium aluminate cement in comparison with other dental cements and resin-based materials.铝酸钙水泥与其他牙科用水泥及树脂基材料相比的细胞毒性。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2006 Feb;64(1):1-8. doi: 10.1080/00016350500279568.