Kohlhardt M
Am J Cardiol. 1984 Nov 14;54(9):13D-19D. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(84)80279-9.
Antiarrhythmic efficacy may result from the ability of class I drugs to depress cardiac sodium currents (INa). Drug interaction with sodium channels could underlie INa blockade and can be defined in terms of the law of mass action which is modulated by many experimental conditions. As exemplified by propafenone, INa blockade occurs in 2 forms: tonic and phasic inhibition. Steady-state phasic (or use-dependent) INa blockade is determined by the interstimulus interval and reflects a labile equilibrium between drug occupancy of and dissociation from a channel-associated binding site. The drug-specific kinetics of the latter process together with the duration of the diastole determine the accumulation of blocked, that is, nonconductive, channels. Several lines of evidence suggest that tonic and phasic INa blockade are not 2 different manifestations of the same molecular event. Decreasing resting potential or reducing extracellular Na+ concentration strongly accentuates tonic blockade, whereas phasic blockade is comparatively less affected by these interventions. Consistent with this special susceptibility are individual concentration-response relations characterized by different apparent dissociation constants and Hill (nH) coefficients. Cardiac sodium channels presumably possess less drug affinity under resting conditions. Their binding of drugs no longer seems to be an allosteric process during repetitive stimulation, but could be characterized by 1:1 stoichiometry.
抗心律失常作用可能源于Ⅰ类药物抑制心脏钠电流(INa)的能力。药物与钠通道的相互作用可能是INa阻断的基础,并且可以根据质量作用定律来定义,该定律受许多实验条件的调节。以普罗帕酮为例,INa阻断有两种形式:强直抑制和位相抑制。稳态位相(或使用依赖性)INa阻断由刺激间隔决定,并反映药物占据通道相关结合位点与从该位点解离之间的不稳定平衡。后一过程的药物特异性动力学以及舒张期的持续时间决定了被阻断即无传导性的通道的积累。几条证据表明,强直和位相INa阻断并非同一分子事件的两种不同表现形式。降低静息电位或降低细胞外Na+浓度会强烈增强强直阻断,而位相阻断受这些干预的影响相对较小。与此特殊敏感性一致的是,个体浓度-反应关系的特征在于不同的表观解离常数和希尔(nH)系数。心脏钠通道在静息条件下可能具有较低的药物亲和力。在重复刺激期间,它们与药物的结合似乎不再是一个变构过程,而是可以用1:1化学计量来表征。