• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氨苄西林-头孢噻肟与氨苄西林-氯霉素治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎的比较:55例患者的经验

A comparison of ampicillin-cefotaxime and ampicillin-chloramphenicol in childhood bacterial meningitis: an experience in 55 patients.

作者信息

Lapointe J R, Béliveau C, Chicoine L, Joncas J H

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Sep;14 Suppl B:167-80. doi: 10.1093/jac/14.suppl_b.167.

DOI:10.1093/jac/14.suppl_b.167
PMID:6094437
Abstract

Ampicillin-cefotaxime was tested as initial therapy of presumptive bacterial meningitis in 55 children greater than or equal to 2 months of age at our hospital. During the first year of this ongoing trial, 11 patients, 10 whose CSF yielded ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae type b (MIC greater than 16 mg/l, beta-lactamase +) and one, indole-negative proteus (MIC 4 mg/l), were begun on ampicillin-cefotaxime and then continued on cefotaxime alone. All did well clinically except one who convulsed briefly but recovered without sequelae. The cefotaxime MICs/MBCs of the beta-lactamase-positive H. influenzae isolates (less than or equal to 0.007 to 0.03/less than or equal to 0.007 to 0.12) and the proteus isolate (0.03/0.12) were significantly lower than chloramphenicol MICs/MBCs (0.25 to 1.0/0.5 to 1.0 and 8/greater than 16). We followed 44 other children with meningitis due to ampicillin-sensitive organisms who were treated with ampicillin or penicillin after 1 or 2 days of ampicillin-cefotaxime. Aetiological agents included ampicillin-sensitive H. influenzae (25), pneumococci (9), meningococci (8), Strept. MG (1) and Listeria monocytogenes (1). 40/44 recovered uneventfully. There were 4 neurological complications: the streptococcal meningitis sustained a brain abscess and the three others were motor incoordination (sensitive haemophilus), hearing loss and subdural effusion (2 pneumococci). There were no deaths. 18/48 children managed initially with ampicillin-chloramphenicol during the same 12-month period one year earlier had significant neurological complications and/or sequelae and there was one death; aetiological agents included sensitive H. influenzae (30), pneumococci (9), ampicillin-resistant haemophilus (5), meningococci (3) and pneumococci plus strept. MG (1). The two groups were comparable except for the number of resistant haemophilus and meningococcal strains and underlying disease more frequent in the ampicillin-cefotaxime group. A significant reduction of neurological morbidity (5/55 or 9.1% vs. 18/48 or 37.5%:P less than 0.001) was therefore associated with the ampicillin-cefotaxime schedule in the initial treatment of proven bacterial meningitis. A prolonged hospitalization (greater than 15 days) was less frequent (P less than 0.01) in the ampicillin-cefotaxime group (3/55 or 5.5% vs. 13/48 or 27.1%). The results of the trial to date are considered to be very promising.

摘要

在我院,对55例年龄大于或等于2个月的儿童,用氨苄西林-头孢噻肟作为推测性细菌性脑膜炎的初始治疗方法进行了试验。在这项正在进行的试验的第一年,11例患者开始接受氨苄西林-头孢噻肟治疗,之后仅继续使用头孢噻肟,其中10例脑脊液培养出对氨苄西林耐药的b型流感嗜血杆菌(MIC大于16mg/L,β-内酰胺酶阳性),1例为吲哚阴性变形杆菌(MIC 4mg/L)。除1例短暂惊厥但未留后遗症外,所有患者临床情况良好。β-内酰胺酶阳性的流感嗜血杆菌分离株(小于或等于0.007至0.03/小于或等于0.007至0.12)和变形杆菌分离株(0.03/0.12)的头孢噻肟MICs/MBCs显著低于氯霉素的MICs/MBCs(0.25至1.0/0.5至1.0和8/大于16)。我们随访了另外44例因对氨苄西林敏感的病原体引起脑膜炎的儿童,他们在接受1或2天的氨苄西林-头孢噻肟治疗后,改用氨苄西林或青霉素治疗。病原体包括对氨苄西林敏感的流感嗜血杆菌(25例)、肺炎球菌(9例)、脑膜炎球菌(8例)、无乳链球菌(1例)和单核细胞增生李斯特菌(1例)。44例中有40例康复顺利。有4例神经并发症:链球菌性脑膜炎并发脑脓肿,另外3例分别为运动不协调(流感嗜血杆菌敏感株)、听力丧失和硬膜下积液(2例肺炎球菌)。无死亡病例。在一年前同一12个月期间,最初用氨苄西林-氯霉素治疗的48例儿童中有18例有明显的神经并发症和/或后遗症,并有1例死亡;病原体包括敏感的流感嗜血杆菌(30例)、肺炎球菌(9例)、对氨苄西林耐药的嗜血杆菌(5例)、脑膜炎球菌(3例)以及肺炎球菌加无乳链球菌(1例)。除了耐药嗜血杆菌和脑膜炎球菌菌株数量以及潜在疾病在氨苄西林-头孢噻肟组中更常见外,两组具有可比性。因此,在确诊的细菌性脑膜炎的初始治疗中,氨苄西林-头孢噻肟方案与神经疾病发病率的显著降低相关(5/55或9.1%对18/48或37.5%:P小于0.001)。氨苄西林-头孢噻肟组住院时间延长(大于15天)的情况较少(P小于0.01)(3/55或5.5%对13/48或27.1%)。迄今为止,该试验的结果被认为非常有前景。

相似文献

1
A comparison of ampicillin-cefotaxime and ampicillin-chloramphenicol in childhood bacterial meningitis: an experience in 55 patients.氨苄西林-头孢噻肟与氨苄西林-氯霉素治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎的比较:55例患者的经验
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Sep;14 Suppl B:167-80. doi: 10.1093/jac/14.suppl_b.167.
2
Randomised comparison of chloramphenicol, ampicillin, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone for childhood bacterial meningitis. Finnish Study Group.氯霉素、氨苄西林、头孢噻肟和头孢曲松用于儿童细菌性脑膜炎的随机对照研究。芬兰研究小组。
Lancet. 1989 Jun 10;1(8650):1281-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92685-8.
3
A prospective randomized comparison of cefotaxime vs ampicillin and chloramphenicol for bacterial meningitis in children.
J Pediatr. 1985 Jul;107(1):129-33. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(85)80634-x.
4
In vitro comparison of ampicillin-chloramphenicol and ampicillin-cefotaxime against 284 Haemophilus isolates.氨苄西林-氯霉素与氨苄西林-头孢噻肟对284株嗜血杆菌分离株的体外比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 Apr;29(4):594-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.29.4.594.
5
Cefuroxime versus ampicillin plus chloramphenicol in childhood bacterial meningitis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.头孢呋辛与氨苄西林加氯霉素治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎的多中心随机对照试验。
J Pediatr. 1986 Jul;109(1):123-30. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(86)80591-1.
6
Ceftriaxone versus ampicillin and chloramphenicol for treatment of bacterial meningitis in children.头孢曲松与氨苄西林及氯霉素治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎的疗效比较
Lancet. 1983 Jun 4;1(8336):1241-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)92696-x.
7
Antibiotic susceptibility of type b Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae, and antibiotic concentration in cerebrospinal fluid.b型流感嗜血杆菌和肺炎链球菌的抗生素敏感性以及脑脊液中的抗生素浓度
Acta Paediatr Jpn. 1990 Apr;32(2):132-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200x.1990.tb00798.x.
8
Cefotaxime therapy of bacterial meningitis in children.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Sep;14 Suppl B:181-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/14.suppl_b.181.
9
Prospective comparative trial of moxalactam versus ampicillin or chloramphenicol for treatment of Haemophilus influenzae type b meningitis in children.羟羧氧酰胺菌素与氨苄西林或氯霉素治疗儿童b型流感嗜血杆菌脑膜炎的前瞻性对照试验
J Pediatr. 1984 Mar;104(3):447-53. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(84)81115-4.
10
Prospective comparative trial of ceftriaxone vs. conventional therapy for treatment of bacterial meningitis in children.头孢曲松与传统疗法治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎的前瞻性对照试验
Pediatr Infect Dis. 1985 Jul-Aug;4(4):362-8. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198507000-00006.

引用本文的文献

1
Clearance of Persistent Bacteremia in a Preterm Neonate With the Use of Combination Cefazolin and Ertapenem.联合使用头孢唑林和厄他培南清除早产儿持续性菌血症
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2020;25(6):547-551. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-25.6.547.
2
The effect of antibiotic exposure on eicosanoid generation from arachidonic acid and gene expression in a primitive chordate, Branchiostoma belcheri.抗生素暴露对原始脊索动物文昌鱼中花生四烯酸生成类二十烷酸及基因表达的影响。
FEBS Open Bio. 2015 Jul 29;5:615-24. doi: 10.1016/j.fob.2015.07.004. eCollection 2015.
3
Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis.
第三代头孢菌素与传统抗生素治疗急性细菌性脑膜炎的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD001832. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001832.pub3.
4
Ampicillin-cefotaxime for initial treatment of bacterial meningitis in children.氨苄西林-头孢噻肟用于儿童细菌性脑膜炎的初始治疗。
Can Med Assoc J. 1985 May 1;132(9):1006.
5
In vitro comparison of ampicillin-chloramphenicol and ampicillin-cefotaxime against 284 Haemophilus isolates.氨苄西林-氯霉素与氨苄西林-头孢噻肟对284株嗜血杆菌分离株的体外比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 Apr;29(4):594-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.29.4.594.
6
Cefotaxime versus chloramphenicol for ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae meningitis. A retrospective study of 62 cases.
Drugs. 1988;35 Suppl 2:199-202. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198800352-00043.
7
Cefotaxime. An update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use.头孢噻肟。其药理学与治疗应用的最新进展。
Drugs. 1990 Oct;40(4):608-51. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199040040-00008.