• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Cefotaxime therapy of bacterial meningitis in children.

作者信息

Wells T G, Trang J M, Brown A L, Marmer B C, Jacobs R F

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Sep;14 Suppl B:181-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/14.suppl_b.181.

DOI:10.1093/jac/14.suppl_b.181
PMID:6094438
Abstract

Thirty children with bacterial meningitis were randomized to receive either ampicillin and chloramphenicol in standard doses or cefotaxime (50 mg/kg/dose every 6 h) for 10 to 14 days. Eighteen patients received ampicillin and chloramphenicol and 12 patients received cefotaxime. Cerebrospinal fluid isolated included: Haemophilus influenzae (20), Streptococcus pneumoniae (4), Neisseria meningitidis (3), Group B streptococcus (2), and Salmonella enteritidis (1). Five of the H. influenzae isolates were ampicillin resistant but no isolates were resistant to cefotaxime. The minimum inhibitory concentrations of cefotaxime for 30 isolates ranged from 0.0004 to 0.06 mg/l, while the minimum bactericidal concentrations ranged from 0.007 to 0.12 mg/l. The cerebrospinal fluid bactericidal titres for the cefotaxime-treated group ranged from 1:64 to 1:1024. On the second day of therapy the mean cefotaxime serum concentrations were 56.9 +/- 28.7 mg/l at 1 h and 3.66 +/- 5.65 mg/l at 6 h after administration of the drug whilst mean desacetyl-cefotaxime serum concentrations were 12.31 +/- 7.56 mg/l at one hour and 7.96 +/- 8.26 mg/l at 6 h respectively. Cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime measured one hour after drug administration were 3.72 +/- 5.57 mg/l and 4.35 +/- 7.12 mg/l, respectively. No adverse drug reactions were noted in either treatment group. Cefotaxime proved to be both as safe and as efficacious as standard therapy for the treatment of bacterial meningitis in children.

摘要

相似文献

1
Cefotaxime therapy of bacterial meningitis in children.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Sep;14 Suppl B:181-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/14.suppl_b.181.
2
A prospective randomized comparison of cefotaxime vs ampicillin and chloramphenicol for bacterial meningitis in children.
J Pediatr. 1985 Jul;107(1):129-33. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(85)80634-x.
3
Pharmacokinetics and clinical evaluation of cefotaxime in children suffering with purulent meningitis.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Sep;14 Suppl B:161-5. doi: 10.1093/jac/14.suppl_b.161.
4
Treatment of 160 cases of acute bacterial meningitis with cefotaxime.用头孢噻肟治疗160例急性细菌性脑膜炎。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Sep;14 Suppl B:195-202. doi: 10.1093/jac/14.suppl_b.195.
5
A comparison of ampicillin-cefotaxime and ampicillin-chloramphenicol in childhood bacterial meningitis: an experience in 55 patients.氨苄西林-头孢噻肟与氨苄西林-氯霉素治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎的比较:55例患者的经验
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Sep;14 Suppl B:167-80. doi: 10.1093/jac/14.suppl_b.167.
6
[Cefotaxime monotherapy in bacterial meningitis in childhood].
Monatsschr Kinderheilkd. 1986 Oct;134(10):733-7.
7
Randomised comparison of chloramphenicol, ampicillin, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone for childhood bacterial meningitis. Finnish Study Group.氯霉素、氨苄西林、头孢噻肟和头孢曲松用于儿童细菌性脑膜炎的随机对照研究。芬兰研究小组。
Lancet. 1989 Jun 10;1(8650):1281-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92685-8.
8
Prospective comparative trial of ceftriaxone vs. conventional therapy for treatment of bacterial meningitis in children.头孢曲松与传统疗法治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎的前瞻性对照试验
Pediatr Infect Dis. 1985 Jul-Aug;4(4):362-8. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198507000-00006.
9
Comparison of ceftriaxone and traditional therapy of bacterial meningitis.头孢曲松与细菌性脑膜炎传统疗法的比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Jan;25(1):40-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.25.1.40.
10
Treatment of childhood bacterial meningitis.儿童细菌性脑膜炎的治疗
Infection. 1989 Sep-Oct;17(5):343-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01650726.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic Review of the Pharmacological Evidence for the Selection of Antimicrobials in Bacterial Infections of the Central Nervous System in Dogs and Cats.犬猫中枢神经系统细菌感染中抗菌药物选择的药理学证据的系统评价
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Jan 18;8:769588. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.769588. eCollection 2021.
2
Antibiotic regimens for early-onset neonatal sepsis.新生儿早发性败血症的抗生素治疗方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 17;5(5):CD013837. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013837.pub2.
3
Antibiotic regimens for late-onset neonatal sepsis.
晚发型新生儿败血症的抗生素治疗方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 8;5(5):CD013836. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013836.pub2.
4
Pharmacokinetics of antibacterial agents in the CSF of children and adolescents.抗菌药物在儿童和青少年脑脊液中的药代动力学。
Paediatr Drugs. 2013 Apr;15(2):93-117. doi: 10.1007/s40272-013-0017-5.
5
Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis.第三代头孢菌素与传统抗生素治疗急性细菌性脑膜炎的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD001832. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001832.pub3.
6
Chloramphenicol or ceftriaxone, or both, as treatment for meningitis in developing countries?在发展中国家,氯霉素或头孢曲松,或两者并用,可用于治疗脑膜炎吗?
Arch Dis Child. 2003 Jun;88(6):536-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.88.6.536.
7
In vitro antibiotic sensitivity pattern of common bacterial isolates from cases of acute bacterial meningitis with special reference to ceftriaxone.急性细菌性脑膜炎病例中常见分离菌株的体外抗生素敏感性模式,特别提及头孢曲松。
Indian J Pediatr. 1997 Nov-Dec;64(6):849-54. doi: 10.1007/BF02725510.
8
Third generation cephalosporins in the parenteral to oral switch.肠外给药转换为口服给药的第三代头孢菌素
Pharmacoeconomics. 1994;5(Suppl 2):27-33. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199400052-00006.
9
Cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime pharmacokinetics in infants and children with meningitis.头孢噻肟和去乙酰头孢噻肟在患脑膜炎婴幼儿及儿童中的药代动力学
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Dec;28(6):791-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.28.6.791.
10
Cephalosporins in the treatment of meningitis.头孢菌素类药物在脑膜炎治疗中的应用
Drugs. 1987;34 Suppl 2:135-53. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198700342-00011.