• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹膜炎的短期抗生素治疗:比较头孢噻肟-甲硝唑与克林霉素-妥布霉素的前瞻性随机试验

Short-term antibiotherapy for peritonitis: prospective, randomized trial comparing cefotaxime-metronidazole and clindamycin-tobramycin.

作者信息

Biron S, Brochu G, Béland L, Bourque R A, Marceau P, Piché P, Potvin M

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Sep;14 Suppl B:213-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/14.suppl_b.213.

DOI:10.1093/jac/14.suppl_b.213
PMID:6094442
Abstract

The combination of cefotaxime and metronidazole has been suggested for the treatment of peritonitis. We compared their effectiveness with that of tobramycin and clindamycin. Since antibiotics have most of their beneficial effect within a few days a four day course was used and a randomized trial was undertaken. The effectiveness of the 4-day course was 86% and no difference was seen between the two groups of the study.

摘要

有人建议联合使用头孢噻肟和甲硝唑治疗腹膜炎。我们将它们的疗效与妥布霉素和克林霉素的疗效进行了比较。由于抗生素在几天内就能发挥大部分有益作用,因此采用了为期四天的疗程并进行了一项随机试验。该四天疗程的有效率为86%,且研究的两组之间未观察到差异。

相似文献

1
Short-term antibiotherapy for peritonitis: prospective, randomized trial comparing cefotaxime-metronidazole and clindamycin-tobramycin.腹膜炎的短期抗生素治疗:比较头孢噻肟-甲硝唑与克林霉素-妥布霉素的前瞻性随机试验
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Sep;14 Suppl B:213-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/14.suppl_b.213.
2
Prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of metronidazole and tobramycin with clindamycin and tobramycin in the treatment of intra-abdominal sepsis.甲硝唑与妥布霉素联用和克林霉素与妥布霉素联用治疗腹腔内脓毒症的前瞻性、随机、双盲比较
Ann Surg. 1980 Aug;192(2):213-20. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198008000-00015.
3
[Comparison of 2 antibiotic combinations used for peritonitis. Cefotaxime-clindamycin versus cefotaxime-metronidazole].
Presse Med. 1991 Jan 19;20(2):57-60.
4
Prospective, randomized, comparative trials in the therapy for intraabdominal and female genital tract infections.
Rev Infect Dis. 1984 Mar-Apr;6 Suppl 1:S283-92. doi: 10.1093/clinids/6.supplement_1.s283.
5
Moxalactam vs tobramycin-clindamycin. A randomized trial in secondary peritonitis.羟羧氧酰胺菌素与妥布霉素-克林霉素对比:继发性腹膜炎的一项随机试验
Arch Surg. 1988 Jun;123(6):714-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400300060009.
6
[Cefotetan versus clindamycin-tobramycin in experimental acute peritonitis in the rat].[头孢替坦与克林霉素-妥布霉素用于大鼠实验性急性腹膜炎的比较]
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 1987;23(4):907-9.
7
[Clinical evaluation of ceftazidime and the combined administration of cefotaxime and tobramycin in the treatment of urinary tract infections. Prospective and randomized studies].[头孢他啶及头孢噻肟与妥布霉素联合应用治疗尿路感染的临床评价。前瞻性和随机研究]
Pol Tyg Lek. 1986 Sep 29;41(39):1242-6.
8
Aztreonam plus clindamycin vs. tobramycin plus clindamycin for the treatment of intraabdominal infections.氨曲南加克林霉素与妥布霉素加克林霉素治疗腹腔内感染的比较。
Rev Infect Dis. 1985 Nov-Dec;7 Suppl 4:S724-8. doi: 10.1093/clinids/7.supplement_4.s724.
9
Moxalactam versus clindamycin plus tobramycin in the treatment of obstetric and gynecologic infections.羟羧氧酰胺菌素与克林霉素加妥布霉素治疗妇产科感染的比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Aug 1;152(7 Pt 1):808-17. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(85)80068-5.
10
Clinical comparison of cefotaxime versus the combination of gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of peritonitis and similar polymicrobial soft-tissue surgical sepsis.
Clin Ther. 1981;4 Suppl A:67-80.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotic regimens for secondary peritonitis of gastrointestinal origin in adults.成人胃肠道源性继发性腹膜炎的抗生素治疗方案
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;2005(2):CD004539. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004539.pub2.
2
Operative and nonoperative therapy of intraabdominal infections.腹腔内感染的手术及非手术治疗
Infection. 1998 Sep-Oct;26(5):335-41. doi: 10.1007/BF02962267.