Escamilla J, Santiago L T, Sangalang R P, Ranoa C P, Cross J H
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1984 Jun;15(2):161-6.
Eight hundred blood cultures were tested in parallel in three conventional systems: tryptic soy broth containing 0.05% sodium polyanethosulfonate (TSB-SPS), whole blood in bile (BILE-BLOOD), and blood clots in bile (BILE-CLOT). Sixty-eight cultures were Salmonella typhi positive and 29 were positive for S. paratyphi A in at least one of the systems. Analysis of the isolation rates of the 97 Salmonella-positive specimens showed that BILE-BLOOD was significantly more sensitive (p less than 0.05) than either TSB-SPS or BILE-CLOTS, and that the latter two were not significantly different. The time required for positive results was shortest in BLOOD-BILE which was significantly quicker than BILE-CLOTs (p less than 0.05), but not TSB-SPS (p greater than 0.05). Possible explanations for the observed, superior performance of the BILE-BLOOD system are discussed and recommendations for efficient recovery of enteric fever salmonellae from blood are presented.
在三种传统系统中对800份血培养标本进行了平行检测:含有0.05%多聚茴香脑磺酸钠的胰蛋白胨大豆肉汤(TSB-SPS)、胆汁中的全血(BILE-BLOOD)以及胆汁中的血凝块(BILE-CLOT)。在至少一种系统中,68份培养物伤寒沙门菌呈阳性,29份副伤寒甲杆菌呈阳性。对97份沙门菌阳性标本的分离率分析表明,BILE-BLOOD比TSB-SPS或BILE-CLOTS的敏感性显著更高(p小于0.05),而后两者之间无显著差异。BLOOD-BILE中获得阳性结果所需时间最短,显著快于BILE-CLOTs(p小于0.05),但快于TSB-SPS不显著(p大于0.05)。讨论了观察到的BILE-BLOOD系统卓越性能的可能解释,并提出了从血液中有效分离伤寒热沙门菌的建议。