• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

属于血清型I和II的传染性法氏囊病病毒分离株的核酸和结构蛋白。

Nucleic acid and structural proteins of infectious bursal disease virus isolates belonging to serotypes I and II.

作者信息

Jackwood D J, Saif Y M, Hughes J H

出版信息

Avian Dis. 1984 Oct-Dec;28(4):990-1006.

PMID:6098258
Abstract

The nucleic acid and structural proteins of infectious bursal disease virus serotype I (six isolates) were compared with those of serotype II (two isolates). Five of the serotype I isolates originated from chickens, whereas both serotype II isolates were from turkeys. The growth curves of representative isolates of both serotypes were similar, but the latent period and virus yield were different. The seven isolates tested had two segments of double-stranded genomic RNA. The RNA migration patterns of viruses belonging to each serotype were similar, but differences were noticed between the two serotypes. There were differences in the molecular weights of viral proteins (VP) 3 and 4 from the two serotypes, and serotype II isolates lacked VP-2.

摘要

将传染性法氏囊病病毒血清型I(六个分离株)的核酸和结构蛋白与血清型II(两个分离株)的进行了比较。血清型I的五个分离株源自鸡,而血清型II的两个分离株均来自火鸡。两种血清型代表性分离株的生长曲线相似,但潜伏期和病毒产量不同。所测试的七个分离株有两段双链基因组RNA。属于每种血清型的病毒的RNA迁移模式相似,但两种血清型之间存在差异。两种血清型的病毒蛋白(VP)3和4的分子量存在差异,并且血清型II分离株缺乏VP-2。

相似文献

1
Nucleic acid and structural proteins of infectious bursal disease virus isolates belonging to serotypes I and II.属于血清型I和II的传染性法氏囊病病毒分离株的核酸和结构蛋白。
Avian Dis. 1984 Oct-Dec;28(4):990-1006.
2
Characteristics and serologic studies of two serotypes of infectious bursal disease virus in turkeys.火鸡传染性法氏囊病病毒两种血清型的特性及血清学研究
Avian Dis. 1982 Oct-Dec;26(4):871-82.
3
Serological survey of infectious bursal disease virus serotypes 1 and 2 in California turkeys.
Avian Dis. 1984 Oct-Dec;28(4):1026-36.
4
Immunogenicity and antigenicity of infectious bursal disease virus serotypes I and II in chickens.
Avian Dis. 1985 Oct-Dec;29(4):1184-94.
5
Isolation of infectious bursal disease virus from turkeys with arthritic and respiratory symptoms in commercial farms in Quebec.从魁北克商业养殖场患有关节炎和呼吸道症状的火鸡中分离传染性法氏囊病病毒。
Avian Dis. 1991 Jan-Mar;35(1):3-7.
6
Peptide map comparison of the proteins of infectious bursal disease virus.传染性法氏囊病病毒蛋白质的肽图比较
J Virol. 1979 Dec;32(3):1047-50. doi: 10.1128/JVI.32.3.1047-1050.1979.
7
Characterisation of orbiviruses of the Kemerovo serogroup: comparison of protein and RNA profiles.克麦罗沃血清群环状病毒的特性:蛋白质和RNA图谱比较
Acta Virol. 1986 Jul;30(4):320-4.
8
Infectious bursal disease virus: further characterization with evidence for a single-stranded RNA virus.传染性法氏囊病病毒:单链RNA病毒证据的进一步特征分析
Avian Dis. 1980 Apr-Jun;24(2):423-34.
9
Growth of serotypes I and II and variant strains of infectious bursal disease virus in Vero cells.
Avian Dis. 1988 Apr-Jun;32(2):298-303.
10
Serologic evidence of infectious bursal disease virus serotype II infection in Minnesota turkeys.
Avian Dis. 1984 Jul-Sep;28(3):765-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Hypericum perforatum extract therapy for chickens experimentally infected with infectious bursal disease virus and its influence on immunity.贯叶连翘提取物对实验性感染传染性法氏囊病病毒鸡的治疗及其对免疫力的影响。
Can J Vet Res. 2012 Jul;76(3):180-5.
2
Molecular weight determination of the two segments of double-stranded RNA of infectious bursal disease virus, a member of the birnavirus group.传染性法氏囊病病毒(双RNA病毒科成员)双链RNA两段的分子量测定
Med Microbiol Immunol. 1987;176(2):113-21. doi: 10.1007/BF00200683.
3
Detection of infectious bursal disease viruses by using cloned cDNA probes.
利用克隆的 cDNA 探针检测传染性法氏囊病病毒
J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Nov;27(11):2437-43. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.11.2437-2443.1989.
4
Comparison of neutralizing antigens of recent isolates of infections bursal disease virus.传染性法氏囊病病毒近期分离株中和抗原的比较
Arch Virol. 1991;117(3-4):287-96. doi: 10.1007/BF01310772.