Renaud M, Beauchemin J, Lalonde C, Poirier H, Berthiaume S
Am J Public Health. 1980 Oct;70(10):1068-73. doi: 10.2105/ajph.70.10.1068.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether physicians practicing in one type of setting manage a medical problem differently than those practicing in another type of setting. The investigation took the form of presenting physicians with a simulated case of tension headache with a history going back three years, for which diazepam had been taken daily for the past year. Four simulated patients (aged 20-23) visited a stratified random sample of 111 general practitioners practicing in health centers funded by government (CLSCs) and in private group practice clinics in the Montreal area. Fifty-one per cent of group practice physicians recommended therapy rated as "inadequate" compared to 25 per cent in CLSCs; in addition, the data show significant differences between CLSC and group practice physicians in performing various aspects of the clinical examination. Alternative explanations for the observed differences are discussed.
本研究的目的是确定在一种环境中执业的医生处理医疗问题的方式是否与在另一种环境中执业的医生不同。调查采用向医生呈现一个紧张性头痛的模拟病例的形式,该病例有三年病史,在过去一年中每天服用地西泮。四名模拟患者(年龄在20 - 23岁之间)走访了蒙特利尔地区由政府资助的社区医疗中心(CLSCs)和私人团体诊所中执业的111名全科医生的分层随机样本。在私人团体诊所中,51%的医生推荐的治疗被评为“不充分”,而在社区医疗中心这一比例为25%;此外,数据显示社区医疗中心和私人团体诊所的医生在进行临床检查的各个方面存在显著差异。文中讨论了对观察到的差异的其他解释。