Zung W W, Daniel J T, King R E, Moore D T
J Clin Psychiatry. 1981 Jul;42(7):280-4.
A double-blind, random design, parallel group, four-week study of prazepam, diazepam, lorazepam, and placebo was conducted in diverse private outpatient practices (surgeon, internist, and obstetrician-gynecologist) using a common protocol, in order to evaluate their comparative efficacy in these settings. In addition, the effects of these anxiolytics on depressive symptoms in patients with anxiety were studied. Results showed that the non-psychiatric practitioners used lower dosages than psychiatrists in previous reports, and perception of anxiety levels of their patients were lower than the psychiatric raters. When patients were divided into two groups (1. predominantly depressed with anxiety, and 2. predominantly anxious with depression), differences between the benzodiazepines were shown. In the high depression-low anxiety group, all four treatment methods were effective in alleviating both anxiety and depression. In the high anxiety-low depression group, only prazepam and placebo were effective in alleviating both anxiety and depression, while diazepam and lorazepam decreased anxiety levels, but not depression.
采用通用方案,在不同的私人门诊机构(外科医生、内科医生和妇产科医生处)进行了一项为期四周的双盲、随机设计、平行组研究,比较了普拉西泮、地西泮、劳拉西泮和安慰剂的效果,以评估它们在这些环境中的相对疗效。此外,还研究了这些抗焦虑药对焦虑症患者抑郁症状的影响。结果显示,与之前报告中的精神科医生相比,非精神科医生使用的剂量更低,且他们对患者焦虑水平的评估低于精神科评估者。当患者被分为两组(1. 以抑郁为主伴焦虑,2. 以焦虑为主伴抑郁)时,苯二氮䓬类药物之间的差异显现出来。在高抑郁 - 低焦虑组中,所有四种治疗方法在缓解焦虑和抑郁方面均有效。在高焦虑 - 低抑郁组中,只有普拉西泮和安慰剂在缓解焦虑和抑郁方面有效,而地西泮和劳拉西泮降低了焦虑水平,但对抑郁无效。