Suppr超能文献

[重症监护病房中高危患者皮肤试验的预后重要性]

[Prognostic importance of skin tests in high-risk patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit].

作者信息

François G, Alazia M, Long P, Blanc M, Bernard D

出版信息

Ann Anesthesiol Fr. 1981;22(3):265-9.

PMID:6117232
Abstract

This report involves the study of skin test carried out using five antigens (tuberculin, candidin, -haemolytic streptococcus, staphylococcus albus, pertussis bacillus) in 33 patients hospitalised in a polyvalent intensive care unit with two criteria of inclusion:--associated excretion of 20 g of nitrogen or more per hour;--severe infectious complications (either pneumonia or septicaemia). Three patient populations were found: true anergism (all skin tests negative), relative anergism (one test only positive) and reactive (at least two tests positive). Results were analysed at two levels. With regard to the value of the tests: the use of candidin or of haemolytic streptococcus alone would have sufficed to classify the patients within the same groups with two exceptions. Secondly, from a prognostic standpoint, the study confirmed data in the literature. There was a significant between the anergic and reactive groups in terms of survival. This applied both to tests performed at the time of admission of the patients as well as those repeated one week later.

摘要

本报告涉及对33例入住多价重症监护病房的患者进行的皮肤试验研究,使用了五种抗原(结核菌素、念珠菌素、β溶血性链球菌、白色葡萄球菌、百日咳杆菌),纳入标准有两条:——每小时氮排泄量达20克或以上;——严重感染并发症(肺炎或败血症)。发现了三类患者群体:真正无反应性(所有皮肤试验均为阴性)、相对无反应性(仅一项试验呈阳性)和反应性(至少两项试验呈阳性)。结果在两个层面进行了分析。关于试验的价值:单独使用念珠菌素或溶血性链球菌就足以将患者分为相同的组,仅有两个例外。其次,从预后角度来看,该研究证实了文献中的数据。无反应性组和反应性组在生存率方面存在显著差异。这适用于患者入院时进行的试验以及一周后重复进行的试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验