Oyediran M A, Akinla O A, Aderinola E A
Int J Fertil. 1982;27(2):109-12.
Two hundred five women attending the Family Planning Clinic of the Department of Community Health were admitted into a nonrandomised study to compare the effectiveness of the Copper-T-200, Nova-T, and Lippes Loop intrauterine devices. Members of the study group of women were found to be older than their European counter-parts and also tended to have a higher parity (81.0% of the total group having more than three children). The expulsion rates and removal rates for bleeding and pain for Copper-T-200 and Nova-T users were respectively 6.5 and 3.8 and 5.0 and 1.5. These results were significantly lower than the rates for the Lippes Loop users which were 14.7 and 6.7, respectively. The continuation rates were higher for the Copper-T-200 (88.2) and the Nova-T (91.3) than for the Lippes Loop (75.5). These findings were essentially similar to those of other worldwide studies.
205名前往社区卫生部门计划生育诊所就诊的女性被纳入一项非随机研究,以比较铜T-200、诺瓦T和利普斯环宫内节育器的有效性。研究组中的女性成员比欧洲同行年龄更大,而且生育胎次也往往更高(总研究组中81.0%的女性生育超过三个孩子)。使用铜T-200和诺瓦T的女性的节育器排出率以及因出血和疼痛而取出节育器的比率分别为6.5%和3.8%,以及5.0%和1.5%。这些结果显著低于使用利普斯环的女性的比率,后者分别为14.7%和6.7%。铜T-200(88.2%)和诺瓦T(91.3%)的续用率高于利普斯环(75.5%)。这些研究结果与全球其他研究的结果基本相似。