• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

顺势疗法治疗骨关节炎的对照试验。

Controlled trial of homoeopathic treatment of osteoarthritis.

作者信息

Shipley M, Berry H, Broster G, Jenkins M, Clover A, Williams I

出版信息

Lancet. 1983 Jan 15;1(8316):97-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)91743-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(83)91743-9
PMID:6129459
Abstract

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study to compare the homoeopathic remedy Rhus tox. 6X with fenoprofen in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee, fenoprofen was shown to have beneficial analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects which differed significantly from those of placebo. The effects of Rhus tox. 6X and placebo did not differ significantly. Patient preference was for fenoprofen. Side-effects were not severe but were seen more frequently with fenoprofen. Similar results were seen in all patients regardless of whether they had been referred to and assessed by a homoeopathic physician or a rheumatologist.

摘要

在一项双盲、安慰剂对照的交叉研究中,为比较顺势疗法药物毒漆树6X与非诺洛芬对髋和膝骨关节炎的疗效,结果显示非诺洛芬具有有益的镇痛和抗炎作用,与安慰剂的作用有显著差异。毒漆树6X和安慰剂的作用没有显著差异。患者更倾向于非诺洛芬。副作用不严重,但在使用非诺洛芬时更常见。无论患者是由顺势疗法医生还是风湿病学家转诊和评估,所有患者都出现了类似的结果。

相似文献

1
Controlled trial of homoeopathic treatment of osteoarthritis.顺势疗法治疗骨关节炎的对照试验。
Lancet. 1983 Jan 15;1(8316):97-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)91743-9.
2
Double-blind crossover study of fenoprofen and aspirin in osteoarthritis.
J Rheumatol. 1976;2:67-70.
3
Controlled evaluation of fenoprofen in geriatric patients with osteoarthritis.
J Rheumatol. 1976;2:76-82.
4
Fenoprofen therapy in large-joint osteoarthritis: double-blind comparison with aspirin and longterm experience.
J Rheumatol. 1976;2:71-5.
5
Four-way, multicenter, crossover trial of ibuprofen, fenoprofen calcium, naproxen, and tolmetin sodium in osteoarthritis: comparative clinical profiles.布洛芬、非诺洛芬钙、萘普生和托美丁钠治疗骨关节炎的四向、多中心、交叉试验:比较临床概况。
South Med J. 1983 Jun;76(6):706-11. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198306000-00006.
6
Efficacy of fenoprofen in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea.
J Reprod Med. 1985 Dec;30(12):915-9.
7
Homoeopathy.顺势疗法
Lancet. 1983 Feb 26;1(8322):482.
8
Fenoprofen in rheumatoid arthritis: a controlled crossover multi-centre study.
J Rheumatol. 1976;2:26-31.
9
Fenoprofen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving maintenance gold therapy.
J Rheumatol. 1976;2:32-7.
10
Fenoprofen.非诺洛芬
Drug Ther Bull. 1974 Jun 21;12(13):51-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Homeopathy for Rheumatological Diseases: A Systematic Review.顺势疗法治疗风湿性疾病:一项系统评价。
Eur J Rheumatol. 2024 Oct 14;11(3):378-384. doi: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2024.23123.
2
Serious mistakes in meta-analysis of homeopathic research.顺势疗法研究的元分析中的严重错误。
J Med Life. 2017 Jan-Mar;10(1):47-49.
3
[Not Available].
Can Fam Physician. 1990 Jan;36:141-81.
4
[The efficacy of classic homeopathic therapy in chronic headache. Study protocol.].
Schmerz. 1992 Jun;6(2):134-40. doi: 10.1007/BF02528131.
5
A systematic review of the quality of homeopathic clinical trials.顺势疗法临床试验质量的系统评价。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2001;1:12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-1-12. Epub 2001 Dec 31.
6
Use of complementary treatment by those hospitalised with acute illness.急性病住院患者使用补充疗法的情况。
Arch Dis Child. 1999 Aug;81(2):133-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.81.2.133.
7
Problems of fertility and their management.生育问题及其处理
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1983 Mar;33(248):171-4.
8
Heterogeneity of 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors in the rat uterus and stomach strip.大鼠子宫和胃条中5-羟色胺受体的异质性。
Br J Pharmacol. 1983 Dec;80(4):691-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1983.tb10059.x.
9
Drop of the weak stuff.倒掉淡的东西。
BMJ. 1988 Sep 3;297(6648):618. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6648.618.
10
The National Health Service versus private and complementary medicine.国民医疗服务体系与私立及替代医学
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 May 21;296(6634):1457-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6634.1457.