Mathews A
J Psychosom Res. 1983;27(2):165-73. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(83)90094-6.
Over a decade of research since the publication of Human Sexual Inadequacy by Masters and Johnson has confirmed the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sexual problems, but has not advanced our understanding of aetiology very much. It is generally assumed that anxiety blocks normal function in sexual disorders such as impotence or frigidity, although hormonal changes have also been suggested. Evidence for either proposition is lacking. Our own attempts to understand mechanisms have included the use of a dismantling strategy to investigate the effective components of psychological treatment, and latterly the role of exogenous androgens. In our first study, brief treatment modelled on that of Masters and Johnson proved superior to another version of graded practice in sexual contact which lacked the counselling component. Similarly, the fuller version had more effect than did imaginal desensitization, suggesting that sexual dysfunctions cannot be treated like phobic anxiety. A second study focused on women complaining of little sexual interest or enjoyment. The use of a minor tranquillizer was compared with that of androgen (testoral) in the hope that different treatments would be shown to be best for different types of disorder. Unexpectedly, the androgen proved best overall while another variable, monthly vs weekly sessions, did not produce any differences in effect. In the most recent study, a further 48 women were given androgens or placebo, and were seen weekly or monthly for four months by either one or two therapists. There were few significant differences, the most consistent being greater subjective improvement by the women being seen at weekly intervals. The failure to find a positive hormone effect in comparison with placebo raises the possibility that the anxiolytic used earlier may have been counter-productive. If so, it seems unlikely that either excessive anxiety or simple androgen deficiency is an adequate aetiological explanation for female sexual dysfunction.
自马斯特斯和约翰逊所著的《人类性机能不全》出版后的十多年研究证实了心理治疗对性问题的有效性,但在病因学理解方面进展甚微。人们普遍认为焦虑会阻碍阳痿或性冷淡等性功能障碍的正常功能,尽管也有人提出了激素变化的观点。但这两种观点都缺乏证据。我们自己对相关机制的研究尝试包括采用拆解策略来探究心理治疗的有效成分,以及后来对外源性雄激素作用的研究。在我们的第一项研究中,以马斯特斯和约翰逊的治疗方法为蓝本的简短治疗被证明优于另一种缺乏咨询环节的性接触分级练习版本。同样,完整版本比想象脱敏疗法效果更好,这表明性功能障碍不能像恐惧焦虑那样进行治疗。第二项研究聚焦于抱怨性兴趣或性快感缺失的女性。将一种轻度镇静剂的使用与雄激素(睾丸素)的使用进行了比较,希望不同的治疗方法对不同类型的障碍显示出最佳效果。出乎意料的是,总体而言雄激素效果最佳,而另一个变量,即每月与每周治疗一次,在效果上没有产生任何差异。在最近的一项研究中,又有48名女性接受了雄激素或安慰剂治疗,并由一名或两名治疗师每周或每月观察四个月。几乎没有显著差异,最一致的结果是每周接受观察的女性主观改善更大。与安慰剂相比未能发现积极的激素效应,这增加了早期使用的抗焦虑药物可能适得其反的可能性。如果是这样,那么过度焦虑或单纯雄激素缺乏似乎都不太可能是女性性功能障碍充分的病因学解释。