Meriney D, Nall T, Wallace D, Rosenzweig D, Goel Z, Grieco M H
Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1980;62(4):442-52. doi: 10.1159/000232547.
14 patients clinically hypersensitive to vespid sting by history, 6 patients with large local reactions and 10 control subjects were skin tested with serial two- and tenfold dilutions of venom and whole-body extract of yellow jacket, wasp, and white-faced hornet antigens. Radioallergosorbent test determinations with the same antigens were also made. Determination of minimal reactive dose by skin testing distinguished control and hypersensitive patients groups for all three antigens using either venom or whole body extract. Yellow jacket venom skin testing detected 12 of 14 patients considered clinically hypersensitive. This was not the case with the other two venoms, possibly because most of the patients were yellow jacket sensitive, or any of the whole-body extracts. The Radioallergosorbent test was less useful than venom skin testing in detecting patients considered clinically sensitive.
对14例有黄蜂蜇伤临床过敏史的患者、6例有严重局部反应的患者和10例对照受试者,用黄蜂、胡蜂和白脸大黄蜂抗原的毒液及全虫提取物的系列两倍和十倍稀释液进行皮肤试验。还用相同抗原进行了放射变应原吸附试验测定。通过皮肤试验确定最小反应剂量,可区分使用毒液或全虫提取物的所有三种抗原的对照患者组和过敏患者组。黄蜂毒液皮肤试验检测出14例临床过敏患者中的12例。另外两种毒液则不然,这可能是因为大多数患者对黄蜂敏感,或者对任何一种全虫提取物敏感。在检测临床敏感患者方面,放射变应原吸附试验不如毒液皮肤试验有用。