Tonet J L, Frank R, Ducardonnet A, Fillette F, Fontaine G, Komajda M, Thomas D, Bousser M G, Grosgogeat Y
Nouv Presse Med. 1981;10(30):2491-4.
One hundred patients with focal cerebral ischaemic attacks of suspected embolic origin were investigated by Holter monitoring to determine whether paroxysmal arrhythmia may have been responsible for the episodes. There were 57 men and 43 women aged from 16 to 79 years (mean 50 years). Ninety-seven had residual focal neurological deficits and 3 had transient ischaemic attacks. The neurological lesions were verified by cerebral angiography in 68. Twenty-one had arterial hypertension and 9 had old myocardial infarction or angina. Nine had a history of palpitations. None had cardiac valve disease. All patients were in sinus rhythm, 4 had ventricular extrasystoles on routine ECG, and 4 had supraventricular extrasystoles. None of the patients were receiving anti-arrythmic drugs at the time of investigation. Holter monitoring was performed for 18 hours in 91 cases and for 24-54 hours in the remaining ones. The interval between the cerebral ischaemic attack and the monitoring was less than one month (mean 20 days) for 50 patients and longer for the others. Cardiac arrythmias were found in 36 patients. Sixteen had more than 10 supraventricular extrasystoles per hour, 13 had runs of 3 to 8 beats of supraventricular tachycardia, 1 had an episode of atrial fibrillation. Eighteen subjects had more than 5 ventricular extrasystoles per hour, 1 had accelerated ventricular rhythm, 2 had runs of 4 to 7 beats of ventricular tachycardia. Two patients had second degree A.V. block. None had palpitations during monitoring. Arrythmias were increasingly frequent with age. Our findings are similar to those obtained with monitoring in ambulatory asympatomatic subjects of the same age without apparent heart diseases reported by other authors. On the other hand, the frequency of arrythmia was unrelated to the time elapsed between the ischaemic attack and Holter monitoring. In conclusion, Holter monitoring performed several weeks after suspected cerebral embolism failed to reveal arrythmias likely to be responsible for a focal cerebral ischaemic attack.
对100例疑似栓塞性起源的局灶性脑缺血发作患者进行动态心电图监测,以确定阵发性心律失常是否可能是这些发作的原因。患者中有57名男性和43名女性,年龄在16至79岁之间(平均50岁)。97例有局灶性神经功能缺损残留,3例有短暂性脑缺血发作。68例通过脑血管造影证实有神经病变。21例有动脉高血压,9例有陈旧性心肌梗死或心绞痛。9例有心悸病史。均无心脏瓣膜病。所有患者均为窦性心律,4例在常规心电图上有室性期前收缩,4例有室上性期前收缩。调查时无一例患者正在服用抗心律失常药物。91例患者进行了18小时的动态心电图监测,其余患者进行了24至54小时的监测。50例患者脑缺血发作与监测之间的间隔小于1个月(平均20天),其他患者间隔更长。36例患者发现有心脏心律失常。16例每小时有超过10次室上性期前收缩,13例有3至8次室上性心动过速发作,1例有房颤发作。18例每小时有超过5次室性期前收缩,1例有加速性室性心律,2例有4至7次室性心动过速发作。2例患者有二度房室传导阻滞。监测期间均无心悸。心律失常随年龄增加而更频繁。我们的发现与其他作者报道的对相同年龄无明显心脏病的动态无症状受试者进行监测所获得的结果相似。另一方面,心律失常的频率与缺血发作和动态心电图监测之间的时间间隔无关。总之,在疑似脑栓塞数周后进行的动态心电图监测未能发现可能导致局灶性脑缺血发作的心律失常。