Tyring S K, Luk A D, Lefkowitz S S
Intervirology. 1981;15(4):223-7. doi: 10.1159/000149235.
Five murine interferon preparations wer compared for their antiviral action on 10 heterologous cell types. Immune interferon preparations induced by either BCG/ old tuberculin in vivo or concanavalin A in vitro exhibited some protection on porcine, monkey and rat cells. This was also noted with interferon induced by polyriboinosinic acid: polyribocytidylic acid (poly I:C) in spleen cells. Interferons induced by poly I:C in vivo or in L-929 cells did not protect these three cell types. All three preparations induced by poly I:C showed some activity on guinea pig cells, but this was not the case with either immune interferon preparation. None of the five preparations exhibited any measurable activity on human, bovine, chick, or rabbit cells.
比较了五种鼠干扰素制剂对10种异源细胞类型的抗病毒作用。卡介苗/旧结核菌素在体内诱导或伴刀豆球蛋白A在体外诱导的免疫干扰素制剂对猪、猴和大鼠细胞有一定保护作用。脾脏细胞中由聚肌苷酸:聚胞苷酸(聚I:C)诱导的干扰素也有此现象。聚I:C在体内或在L-929细胞中诱导的干扰素对这三种细胞类型没有保护作用。聚I:C诱导的所有三种制剂对豚鼠细胞有一定活性,但两种免疫干扰素制剂对豚鼠细胞没有此作用。这五种制剂对人、牛、鸡或兔细胞均未表现出任何可测量的活性。