Hönig W, Moshudis E, Oette K
J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1981 Oct;19(10):1057-61.
In the study of the relatively slow amylase-catalysed hydrolysis of oligosaccharides, it is assumed that the subsequent mutarotation has essentially no effect on the kinetics of the total reaction. Relatively large sampled and long measurement times (slow rate of change in angle of rotation) are necessary for the polarimetric determination of alpha-amylase activity. For these reasons, only urine and duodenal juice are suitable as sample sources. Owing to the absence of coupled reactions and auxilliary enzymes, the polarimetrically determined kinetics are generally more representative of the true kinetics of the amylase reaction, than those obtained with fully enzymic methods; in addition, single determinations by the polarimetric method are less subject to interference by sample components. With measurement times in the order of minutes, the polarimetric method shows excellent linearity, very good proportionality between analytical response and quantity of enzyme, and good precision in series (CV = 1.3%). Comparison of the polarimetric with a chromogenic and a fully enzymic method showed an acceptable correlation (r for each method was about 0.98). T, the polarimetric method shows excellent linearity, very good proportionality between analytical response and quantity of enzyme, and good precision in series (CV = 1.3%). Comparison of the polarimetric with a chromogenic and a fully enzymic method showed an acceptable correlation (r for each method was about 0.98). T, the polarimetric method shows excellent linearity, very good proportionality between analytical response and quantity of enzyme, and good precision in series (CV = 1.3%). Comparison of the polarimetric with a chromogenic and a fully enzymic method showed an acceptable correlation (r for each method was about 0.98). The advantages and disadvantages of the polarimeatric method, with consideration of possible interfering factors, are discussed.
在对寡糖相对缓慢的淀粉酶催化水解研究中,假定随后的变旋对总反应动力学基本没有影响。采用旋光测定法测定α-淀粉酶活性时,需要采集相对大量的样本并进行较长时间的测量(旋光角度变化速率缓慢)。基于这些原因,仅尿液和十二指肠液适合作为样本来源。由于不存在偶联反应和辅助酶,与完全酶法相比,旋光测定法得到的动力学通常更能代表淀粉酶反应的真实动力学;此外,旋光法单次测定受样本成分干扰较小。测量时间以分钟计,旋光法显示出极佳的线性、分析响应与酶量之间非常好的比例关系以及良好的系列精密度(变异系数CV = 1.3%)。旋光法与显色法和完全酶法的比较显示出可接受的相关性(每种方法的r约为0.98)。本文讨论了旋光法的优缺点,并考虑了可能的干扰因素。