Ramsay M, Fitzhardinge P M
Early Hum Dev. 1977 Oct;1(2):151-7. doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(77)90016-0.
50 high-risk infants consecutively selected from the population of a Neonatal Follow-up Clinic were tested using both the Bayley and the Griffiths Scales on the same day by the same psychologist without prior knowledge of the medical history. The mean age at testing was 13.1 mth with a range of 12--15 mth. Scores obtained from the Griffiths Scale were consistently higher than those obtained from either of the Bayley Scales (P less than 0.001). Intercorrelations between the Griffiths and the Bayley test were high at pH 0.01. These results suggest that, although the two tests may be used interchangeably, their numerical scores are not equivalent when administered at this age.
从一家新生儿随访诊所的人群中连续挑选出50名高危婴儿，由同一位心理学家在同一天使用贝利量表和格里菲斯量表进行测试，测试前心理学家对婴儿的病史一无所知。测试时的平均年龄为13.1个月，范围在12至15个月之间。从格里菲斯量表获得的分数始终高于从任何一个贝利量表获得的分数（P小于0.001）。在pH 0.01时，格里菲斯量表和贝利量表测试之间的相互关联度很高。这些结果表明，尽管这两种测试可以交替使用，但在这个年龄段进行测试时，它们的数值分数并不等同。
