Burtin P, Lamerz R, Gendron M C, Maunoury M T, Schnabel G
Immunol Lett. 1982 Feb;4(2):87-91. doi: 10.1016/0165-2478(82)90005-0.
Ovarian and colonic CEA were compared immunologically by means of antisera prepared against each of them. CEAs of both origins were found identical by immunodiffusion methods. In radioimmunological experiments, slight differences were observed between some but not all ovarian CEAs and colonic CEAs and also between different preparations of colonic CEA: no organ specificity of ovarian CEA could be demonstrated. Finally, CEA level was measured in 41 sera of patients with ovarian carcinoma by two radioimmunoassays, one using colonic CEA as tracer and standard and anti-colonic CEA serum, the other using ovarian CEA and anti-ovarian CEA serum: the values given by the two assays were highly correlated (rs = 0.8107), meaning that an organ specific assay for ovarian CEA is not needed.
通过分别针对卵巢癌胚抗原(CEA)和结肠CEA制备的抗血清,对它们进行了免疫学比较。通过免疫扩散法发现,两种来源的CEA是相同的。在放射免疫实验中,部分(但不是全部)卵巢CEA与结肠CEA之间以及不同结肠CEA制剂之间观察到了细微差异:未证明卵巢CEA具有器官特异性。最后,通过两种放射免疫测定法对41例卵巢癌患者的血清CEA水平进行了检测,一种使用结肠CEA作为示踪剂和标准品以及抗结肠CEA血清,另一种使用卵巢CEA和抗卵巢CEA血清:两种测定法给出的值高度相关(rs = 0.8107),这意味着不需要针对卵巢CEA的器官特异性测定法。