Bernstein M, Day J H, Welsh A
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1982 Sep;70(3):205-10. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(82)90043-4.
This study is an attempt to determine the role of double-blind food challenge (DBFC) in suspected food sensitivity in the adult as compared wih established tests of food allergy, including the skin test, RAST, and leukocyte histamine release (LHR) to specific food antigens. Twenty-two subjects (ages 18 to 67) with histories of reactions to foods were challenged with freeze-dried food or placebo in opaque dye-free capsules, in increasing doses over a 90 min span to a total of 13 to 15 gm. This was repeated twice at weekly intervals by similar DBFC. DBFC was preceded by skin testing and venapuncture for RAST and LHR studies. Patients were kept under observation for 2 hr, after which each was asked to maintain a detailed diary of related symptoms and food ingested over the following week. Of 46 DBFCs, 13 (21%) were positive. The correlation with positive skin tests and positive DBFC was 4/13 (30%). The correlation with positive LHR and positive DBFC was lower at 2/13 (15%), and 1/13 (7.6%) with RAST. We concluded that DBFC is an effective test of adult food sensitivity compared with tests usually performed and should be used when the diagnosis is in doubt.
本研究旨在确定双盲食物激发试验(DBFC)在疑似成人食物敏感中的作用,并与已确立的食物过敏检测方法进行比较,这些方法包括针对特定食物抗原的皮肤试验、放射性变应原吸附试验(RAST)和白细胞组胺释放试验(LHR)。22名有食物反应史的受试者(年龄在18至67岁之间)接受了冻干食物或不含色素的不透明胶囊中的安慰剂激发试验,在90分钟内以递增剂量给药,总量为13至15克。通过类似的双盲食物激发试验,每周重复一次,共进行两次。在进行双盲食物激发试验之前,先进行皮肤试验和静脉穿刺,以进行放射性变应原吸附试验和白细胞组胺释放试验研究。患者接受2小时的观察,之后要求每人在接下来的一周内详细记录相关症状和摄入的食物。在46次双盲食物激发试验中,13次(21%)呈阳性。皮肤试验阳性与双盲食物激发试验阳性的相关性为4/13(30%)。白细胞组胺释放试验阳性与双盲食物激发试验阳性的相关性较低,为2/13(15%),放射性变应原吸附试验阳性与双盲食物激发试验阳性的相关性为1/13(7.6%)。我们得出结论,与通常进行的检测方法相比,双盲食物激发试验是检测成人食物敏感的一种有效方法,在诊断存疑时应使用该方法。