Pickup A J, Bojanowski L M, Dawling S, Dinsdale J, Gosling R G
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1982 Jul-Aug;4(4):575-83. doi: 10.1097/00005344-198207000-00008.
Eight healthy male volunteers were given single doses of 75 mg standard and sustained-release amitriptyline in a double-blind, crossover trial. Systolic time intervals (STI) were measured hourly on drug and base-line days. Plasma amitriptyline and nortriptyline were measured hourly on drug days. To correct for diurnal variations, STI values on drug days were compared with values of base-line days at the same hour. Both formulations of amitriptyline produced initial decreases in heart rate (followed by a return to normal values) and a significant decrease in ventricular electrical systole (QTc), which began before plasma amitriptyline could be detected. One of the eight volunteers showed T wave depression following amitriptyline. The preejection period (PEPc) increased significantly in three of the eight volunteers (max 19%), and this change was due to an increase in true isovolumetric contraction time (TICT). The left ventricular ejection time (LVETc) decreased significantly in all volunteers (5%, p less than 0.001), the change being greater after sustained-release amitriptyline. Standard amitriptyline produced larger changes than sustained-release amitriptyline in QTc and PEPc. The overall increase in the PEP/LVET ratio, indicating an impairment of cardiac function, was twice as large after standard than after sustained-release amitriptyline (38% and 16%, respectively). The possible mechanisms of cardiac effects of amitriptyline are discussed. Our findings indicate that a sustained-release preparation may be safer than a standard preparation of amitriptyline, particularly if there is a risk of cardiac complications.
在一项双盲交叉试验中,8名健康男性志愿者分别单次服用75毫克标准阿米替林和缓释阿米替林。在服药日和基线日每小时测量收缩期时间间期(STI)。在服药日每小时测量血浆阿米替林和去甲替林水平。为校正昼夜变化,将服药日的STI值与同一时间的基线日值进行比较。两种剂型的阿米替林均使心率最初下降(随后恢复正常),并使心室电收缩(QTc)显著下降,且在血浆阿米替林可检测到之前就已开始。8名志愿者中有1名在服用阿米替林后出现T波压低。8名志愿者中有3名的射血前期(PEPc)显著增加(最大增加19%),这种变化是由于真正的等容收缩时间(TICT)增加所致。所有志愿者的左心室射血时间(LVETc)均显著下降(5%,p<0.001),缓释阿米替林后的变化更大。标准阿米替林在QTc和PEPc方面产生的变化比缓释阿米替林更大。PEP/LVET比值总体增加表明心脏功能受损,标准阿米替林后的增加幅度是缓释阿米替林后的两倍(分别为38%和16%)。讨论了阿米替林心脏效应的可能机制。我们的研究结果表明,缓释制剂可能比标准阿米替林制剂更安全,尤其是在存在心脏并发症风险的情况下。