Sahn S A
West J Med. 1982 Aug;137(2):99-108.
The presence of pleural effusion enables a physician to obtain a specimen of a body cavity fluid easily. With a systematic analysis of the pleural fluid, in conjunction with the clinical features and ancillary laboratory data, a clinician should be able to arrive at either a presumptive or definitive diagnosis in approximately 90 percent of cases. Selectivity should be exercised in ordering analyses on pleural fluid. The first important deductive step is to decide whether the effusion is a transudate (due to imbalances in hydrostatic or oncotic pressures) or an exudate (inflammatory); serum protein and lactate dehydrogenase measurements will be decisive. The differential diagnosis of a transudate is relatively limited and usually easily discernible from the clinical presentation. The differential diagnosis of exudate poses a more difficult challenge for clinicians. The use of certain pleural fluid tests such as leukocyte count and differential, glucose, pH and, when indicated, pleural fluid amylase determinations, helps to narrow the differential diagnosis of an exudative pleural effusion.
胸腔积液的存在使医生能够轻松获取体腔液标本。通过对胸腔积液进行系统分析,并结合临床特征和辅助实验室数据,临床医生在大约90%的病例中应该能够做出初步诊断或明确诊断。对胸腔积液进行分析时应有所选择。第一个重要的推理步骤是确定积液是漏出液(由于静水压或胶体渗透压失衡)还是渗出液(炎症性);血清蛋白和乳酸脱氢酶测量将起决定性作用。漏出液的鉴别诊断相对有限,通常从临床表现中很容易辨别。渗出液的鉴别诊断对临床医生来说是一个更具挑战性的难题。使用某些胸腔积液检测方法,如白细胞计数及分类、葡萄糖、pH值,以及在有指征时测定胸腔积液淀粉酶,有助于缩小渗出性胸腔积液的鉴别诊断范围。