Suppr超能文献

[对流免疫电泳与标准血清学检测在绵羊布鲁氏菌病诊断中的比较]

[Comparison of counterimmunoelectrophoresis with standard serological tests in the diagnosis of ovine brucellosis].

作者信息

Trap D, Gaumont R

出版信息

Ann Rech Vet. 1982;13(1):33-9.

PMID:6187264
Abstract

Sera from 30 sheep experimentally infected and from 126 others with chronic brucellosis were comparatively studied by serum agglutination (SA), complement fixation (CF), rose bengal (RB), and counter-immunoelectrophoresis (CIEP) test. Standard serological tests, particularly SA and RB, essentially detect antibodies against cell-wall fractions of Brucella (LPS), whereas CIEP responds to intracellular antigens. Antibodies involved in this test appear late but remain a long time in the sera. CIEP is therefore recommended for screening of animals with chronic brucellosis in which SA and often CF and RB tests too negative.

摘要

对30只实验感染的绵羊以及126只患有慢性布鲁氏菌病的绵羊的血清,通过血清凝集试验(SA)、补体结合试验(CF)、孟加拉玫瑰红试验(RB)和对流免疫电泳试验(CIEP)进行了比较研究。标准血清学试验,尤其是SA和RB,主要检测针对布鲁氏菌细胞壁成分(脂多糖)的抗体,而CIEP则针对细胞内抗原。该试验中涉及的抗体出现较晚,但在血清中持续时间较长。因此,对于SA以及通常CF和RB试验均为阴性的慢性布鲁氏菌病动物的筛查,推荐使用CIEP。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验