Trap D, Gaumont R
Ann Rech Vet. 1982;13(1):33-9.
Sera from 30 sheep experimentally infected and from 126 others with chronic brucellosis were comparatively studied by serum agglutination (SA), complement fixation (CF), rose bengal (RB), and counter-immunoelectrophoresis (CIEP) test. Standard serological tests, particularly SA and RB, essentially detect antibodies against cell-wall fractions of Brucella (LPS), whereas CIEP responds to intracellular antigens. Antibodies involved in this test appear late but remain a long time in the sera. CIEP is therefore recommended for screening of animals with chronic brucellosis in which SA and often CF and RB tests too negative.
对30只实验感染的绵羊以及126只患有慢性布鲁氏菌病的绵羊的血清,通过血清凝集试验(SA)、补体结合试验(CF)、孟加拉玫瑰红试验(RB)和对流免疫电泳试验(CIEP)进行了比较研究。标准血清学试验,尤其是SA和RB,主要检测针对布鲁氏菌细胞壁成分(脂多糖)的抗体,而CIEP则针对细胞内抗原。该试验中涉及的抗体出现较晚,但在血清中持续时间较长。因此,对于SA以及通常CF和RB试验均为阴性的慢性布鲁氏菌病动物的筛查,推荐使用CIEP。