Suppr超能文献

用于所有起搏模式的单通道植入式电极的临床评估。“荆棘王冠”导线。

Clinical evaluation of a single-pass implantable electrode for all modes of pacing. The "Crown of Thorns" lead.

作者信息

Wainwright R, Crick J, Sowton E

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1983 Mar;6(2 Pt 1):210-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1983.tb04348.x.

Abstract

Physiological pacing was instituted in 17 patients (11 men and 6 women), mean age 67 years (range 33-77 years), using a variety of multiprogramable generators attached to a permanent single-pass dual chamber electrode. Eleven patients were paced in VAT mode (Cordis 208A or Siemens-Elema 625 generator), two patients in DVI mode (Intermedics Cyberlith IV generator) and four patients in DDD mode (Siemens-Elema 664/P33 or Telectronics Autima unit). Mean intracardiac P wave amplitude was 2.0 mV +/- 0.78/SD, range 0.7-3.6 mV. and mean atrial and ventricular pacing thresholds were 1.0 V and 0.5 V, respectively. Fourteen patients had completely successful A-V pacing during a follow-up period of 4-13 months (mean 7 +/- 2.7 months). Two failures were associated with malposition of the atrial crown and occurred exclusively with the Cordis 208A generator. In both patients generator replacement using a more sensitive unit (Siemens-Elema 625) resulted in successful VAT pacing for most of the time. Complete failure of A-V pacing occurred in only one patient who died from coronary artery disease after four months of follow-up. Thus, all of the remaining 16 patients achieved long-term (6 months) satisfactory physiological pacing using this new lead. We conclude that the "Crown of Thorns" electrode is a successful single-pass unipolar lead and can be used with all types of dual chamber generator for all modes of pacing.

摘要

对17例患者(11例男性,6例女性)进行了生理性起搏,平均年龄67岁(范围33 - 77岁),使用了各种可多程控的发生器连接到永久性单通道双腔电极。11例患者采用VAT模式起搏(Cordis 208A或西门子 - 伊莱玛625发生器),2例患者采用DVI模式起搏(Intermedics Cyberlith IV发生器),4例患者采用DDD模式起搏(西门子 - 伊莱玛664/P33或泰利特尼克斯Autima装置)。心内P波平均振幅为2.0 mV±0.78/标准差,范围为0.7 - 3.6 mV。心房和心室起搏平均阈值分别为1.0 V和0.5 V。14例患者在4 - 13个月(平均7±2.7个月)的随访期内实现了完全成功的房室起搏。2例失败与心房电极头位置不当有关,且仅发生在Cordis 208A发生器上。在这2例患者中,更换为更敏感的发生器(西门子 - 伊莱玛625)后,大部分时间实现了成功的VAT起搏。仅1例患者在随访4个月后死于冠状动脉疾病,出现了房室起搏完全失败。因此,其余16例患者使用这种新电极均实现了长期(6个月)满意的生理性起搏。我们得出结论,“荆棘冠”电极是一种成功的单通道单极电极,可与所有类型的双腔发生器用于所有起搏模式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验