Bidder R T, Hewitt K E, Gray O P
Child Care Health Dev. 1983 Jan-Feb;9(1):1-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.1983.tb00298.x.
Thirty-eight pre-school developmentally delayed children receiving the South Glamorgan Home Advisory Service were included in the study. The children were grouped according to developmental ability and manifesting problems. The effectiveness of three methods of teaching (activity charts, target setting, suggestion) were assessed under a balanced design. Weekly skill gain and increments on checklists were measured at the start and at the end of the study period. Parents' opinions on the different methods of teaching were requested and time samples of duration of home visiting were taken. On weekly skill gain, suggestion proved less effective than activity charts or target setting. Severely delayed children made least progress on weekly skill gains. Progress on checklists was independent of teaching method. However, group differences were observed in that severely delayed children (DQ range 22-61) and older (greater than 17 months) Down's syndrome children made least gains on the checklists. Activity charts were preferred by parents although they were also rated as being the most time consuming. Duration of home visits tended to be greater when activity charts were used. Implications of the findings are discussed with reference to ways of improving advice given to parents and alternative ways of evaluating pre-school educational programmes for particular groups of children.
38名接受南格拉摩根家庭咨询服务的学前发育迟缓儿童被纳入该研究。这些儿童根据发育能力和表现出的问题进行分组。在平衡设计下评估了三种教学方法(活动图表、目标设定、建议)的有效性。在研究期开始和结束时测量每周的技能提升和清单上的增量。征求了家长对不同教学方法的意见,并采集了家访时长的时间样本。在每周技能提升方面,建议被证明不如活动图表或目标设定有效。严重发育迟缓的儿童在每周技能提升方面进步最小。清单上的进展与教学方法无关。然而,观察到存在群体差异,即严重发育迟缓的儿童(发育商范围为22 - 61)和年龄较大(大于17个月)的唐氏综合征儿童在清单上的进步最小。活动图表最受家长青睐,尽管它们也被评为最耗时。使用活动图表时家访时长往往更长。研究结果的影响将参照改进向家长提供建议的方式以及评估特定儿童群体学前教育项目的替代方法进行讨论。