Suppr超能文献

循环休克中的液体复苏:白蛋白、羟乙基淀粉和盐溶液对低血容量性休克和感染性休克患者心肺效应的比较

Fluid resuscitation in circulatory shock: a comparison of the cardiorespiratory effects of albumin, hetastarch, and saline solutions in patients with hypovolemic and septic shock.

作者信息

Rackow E C, Falk J L, Fein I A, Siegel J S, Packman M I, Haupt M T, Kaufman B S, Putnam D

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1983 Nov;11(11):839-50.

PMID:6194934
Abstract

Twenty-six consecutive patients in hypovolemic shock were randomized to fluid challenge with 5% albumin (A), 6% hetastarch (H), or 0.9% saline (S) solutions. Fluid challenge consisted of 250 ml of test fluid every 15 min until the pulmonary artery wedge pressure (WP) reached 15 mm Hg. Thereafter, WP was maintained at 15 mm Hg for an additional 24 h with infusions of the same test fluid. Vital signs, hemodynamic and respiratory variables, as well as arterial lactate and colloid osmotic pressure (COP) were monitored according to protocol. Chest x-rays were performed by standardized technique before fluid challenge and at 12 and 24 h of maintenance fluid therapy and were evaluated for evidence of pulmonary edema. Cardiac function and hemodynamic stability were restored by fluid challenge with A, H, and S. Two to 4 times the volume of S as A or H was required to achieve similar hemodynamic endpoints. COP was increased by fluid challenge with A or H but was markedly reduced by fluid challenge with S and throughout the 24-h maintenance period. Fluid challenge resulted in reductions in COP-WP gradient of 62% in the A, 43% in the H, and 125% in the S groups. Resuscitation with S resulted in a significantly higher incidence of pulmonary edema (87.5%) than did resuscitation with A (22%) or H (22%). Urine output was not different among the groups at any time during the study. We conclude that 6% H performs as well as 5% A as a resuscitative fluid and that resuscitation with either of these colloids is associated with a lower incidence of pulmonary edema than is resuscitation with 0.9% S.

摘要

26例低血容量性休克患者被随机分为三组,分别接受5%白蛋白(A组)、6%羟乙基淀粉(H组)或0.9%生理盐水(S组)进行液体冲击治疗。液体冲击治疗方案为每15分钟输注250ml试验液体,直至肺动脉楔压(WP)达到15mmHg。此后,通过输注相同的试验液体使WP在接下来的24小时内维持在15mmHg。根据方案监测生命体征、血流动力学和呼吸变量,以及动脉血乳酸和胶体渗透压(COP)。在液体冲击治疗前、维持液体治疗12小时和24小时时,采用标准化技术进行胸部X线检查,并评估肺水肿的证据。通过A组、H组和S组的液体冲击治疗,心脏功能和血流动力学稳定性均得以恢复。达到相似的血流动力学终点时,S组所需液体量是A组或H组的2至4倍。A组或H组的液体冲击治疗可使COP升高,但S组的液体冲击治疗以及整个24小时维持期内COP均显著降低。液体冲击治疗使A组的COP-WP梯度降低62%,H组降低43%,S组降低125%。与A组(22%)或H组(22%)相比,S组复苏后肺水肿的发生率显著更高(87.5%)。在研究期间的任何时间,各组间尿量均无差异。我们得出结论,6%的羟乙基淀粉作为复苏液体与5%的白蛋白效果相当,并且与0.9%生理盐水相比,使用这两种胶体中的任何一种进行复苏,肺水肿的发生率更低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验