Bentz M S, Cohen C, Budgeon L R, Demers L M
Urology. 1984 Jan;23(1):75-8. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(84)90185-7.
Comparison of one commercial immunoperoxidase kit for prostate specific acid phosphatase (PSAP) and two for prostate specific antigen (PA) with an unlabelled antibody peroxidase-antiperoxidase (PAP) technique using rabbit antihuman PSAP revealed generally good reproducibility of results on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of primary and metastatic prostatic carcinoma. Frequency of positivity was 92 per cent with both our noncommercial PAP and the kit method for PSAP, and 82 per cent and 89 per cent with kits for PA. Thus, sensitivity with the PA kits was less than with our noncommercial PAP and the kit PSAP, with less intense immunostain and occasional false negatives. Specificity was good with all three kits, and no false positive results were obtained. Commercial immunoperoxidase kits provide a relatively easy and inexpensive means for practicing pathologists in a service-oriented setting to make more precise diagnoses in cases of poorly differentiated or metastatic carcinoma of prostatic origin.
使用兔抗人前列腺特异性酸性磷酸酶(PSAP),将一种用于前列腺特异性酸性磷酸酶(PSAP)的市售免疫过氧化物酶试剂盒和两种用于前列腺特异性抗原(PA)的试剂盒与未标记抗体过氧化物酶-抗过氧化物酶(PAP)技术进行比较,结果显示,在原发性和转移性前列腺癌的福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋切片上,结果通常具有良好的可重复性。我们的非商业PAP试剂盒和PSAP试剂盒的阳性率均为92%,PA试剂盒的阳性率分别为82%和89%。因此,PA试剂盒的敏感性低于我们的非商业PAP试剂盒和PSAP试剂盒,免疫染色强度较低,偶尔会出现假阴性。所有三种试剂盒的特异性都很好,没有获得假阳性结果。对于以服务为导向的病理医生来说,市售免疫过氧化物酶试剂盒提供了一种相对简单且廉价的方法,以便在前列腺来源的低分化或转移性癌病例中做出更准确的诊断。