Duffy J R, Watkins L B
Brain Lang. 1984 Mar;21(2):291-306. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(84)90053-1.
Twenty aphasic and twenty control subjects were examined on two versions of a pantomime recognition and a verbal recognition test; one version containing response choices conceptually/semantically related to target responses, the other containing unrelated response choices. The aphasic group was inferior to controls on the pantomime and verbal recognition tests, although the magnitude and consistency of the differences between aphasics and controls were greater for the pantomime test. The presence of conceptually/semantically related response choices on the pantomime recognition test significantly reduced test scores of aphasic patients, and this reduction was related to the magnitude of the effect of response choice relatedness on their verbal recognition test performance. The findings are consistent with an interpretation of aphasia as an impairment of a central symbolic ability which can affect processing for meaning in both verbal and nonverbal modes of communication.
对20名失语症患者和20名对照受试者进行了两个版本的手势识别和言语识别测试;一个版本包含在概念/语义上与目标反应相关的反应选项,另一个版本包含不相关的反应选项。在手势和言语识别测试中,失语症组的表现不如对照组,尽管失语症患者和对照组之间差异的幅度和一致性在手势测试中更大。手势识别测试中概念/语义相关反应选项的存在显著降低了失语症患者的测试分数,这种降低与反应选项相关性对其言语识别测试表现的影响程度有关。这些发现与将失语症解释为一种中枢符号能力受损的观点一致,这种受损会影响言语和非言语交流模式中意义的处理。