Holden J, Churg A
Am J Surg Pathol. 1984 Apr;8(4):277-9. doi: 10.1097/00000478-198404000-00004.
Using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue and commercial antisera, we evaluated the usefulness of immunohistochemical staining for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and keratin in the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma. All 18 adenocarcinomas of lung examined stained for CEA, usually strongly, while only eight of 22 mesotheliomas stained for CEA and the staining was generally weak. Staining for keratin was observed in 10 of 22 mesotheliomas and 12 of 18 adenocarcinomas; there were no differences in intensity of staining between the groups. We conclude that strong diffuse staining for CEA favors a diagnosis of carcinoma, and negative staining for CEA is against a diagnosis of carcinoma, but these are relative and not absolute criteria. We find that staining for keratin is of no use in distinguishing these types of tumors.
我们使用福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋组织和商业抗血清,评估了癌胚抗原(CEA)和角蛋白免疫组化染色在恶性间皮瘤诊断中的作用。所检查的18例肺腺癌均呈CEA染色,通常染色较强,而22例间皮瘤中只有8例呈CEA染色,且染色通常较弱。22例间皮瘤中有10例呈角蛋白染色,18例腺癌中有12例呈角蛋白染色;两组之间染色强度无差异。我们得出结论,CEA强弥漫性染色支持癌的诊断,CEA阴性染色不支持癌的诊断,但这些都是相对而非绝对标准。我们发现角蛋白染色在区分这些类型的肿瘤方面没有用处。