Dun N J, Kiraly M, Ma R C
J Physiol. 1984 Jun;351:61-76. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015232.
The nature of the putative transmitter(s) mediating the non-cholinergic excitatory post-synaptic potential (e.p.s.p.) described in the preceding paper was investigated by means of electrophysiological, pharmacological and immunohistochemical methods. Serotonin (1-10 microM) when applied by superfusion caused a slow depolarization that closely mimicked the synaptic response in about 60% of the coeliac neurones that exhibited a non-cholinergic e.p.s.p. The serotonin depolarization evoked in low-Ca2+, high-Mg2+ solution or in a Krebs solution containing cholinergic antagonists was quantitatively similar to that elicited in normal Krebs solution. When compared in the same neurones the membrane resistance change during the course of the serotonin depolarization and of the non-cholinergic e.p.s.p., as well as their respective responses to conditioning polarization, were similar. The non-cholinergic e.p.s.p. was reversibly abolished during serotonin-induced depolarization; the blockade persisted when the membrane potential was restored to the resting level by hyperpolarizing current. The serotonin depolarization as well as the non-cholinergic e.p.s.p. were reversibly suppressed by cyproheptadine (20-50 microM), a serotonin antagonist, and enhanced by fluoxetine (30-50 microM), a serotonin reuptake inhibitor. On the other hand, pre-treating the ganglia with L-tryptophan (50 microM), a precursor of serotonin, preferentially augmented the synaptically induced response. A portion of the neurones (15%) were depolarized by substance P (1 microM) which also reversibly desensitized the non-cholinergic e.p.s.p. elicited in these neurones. The remaining neurones (25%) were insensitive to either serotonin or substance P, and the non-cholinergic e.p.s.p.s elicited in these cells were likewise not appreciably affected by these two agents. Furthermore, cyproheptadine, fluoxetine and L-tryptophan had no significant effect on the non-cholinergic e.p.s.p.s elicited in serotonin-insensitive neurones. Using the immunohistofluorescent techniques, dense but unevenly distributed serotonin immunoreactive nerve fibres could be observed surrounding many coeliac neurones. Immunoreactivity was not observed in the ganglia incubated with antisera pre-absorbed with excess serotonin. Collectively our results suggest that serotonin is the mediator of non-cholinergic e.p.s.p.s. elicited in about 60% of coeliac neurones sampled in this study, and that in the remaining neurones the slow depolarization may be generated by substance P and/or some unknown transmitter(s).
采用电生理、药理学及免疫组织化学方法,对前文所述介导非胆碱能兴奋性突触后电位(e.p.s.p.)的假定递质的性质进行了研究。通过灌流施加5-羟色胺(1-10微摩尔)时,约60%呈现非胆碱能e.p.s.p.的腹腔神经节神经元出现缓慢去极化,其与突触反应极为相似。在低钙、高镁溶液或含胆碱能拮抗剂的 Krebs 溶液中诱发的5-羟色胺去极化,在数量上与正常 Krebs 溶液中诱发的相似。在同一神经元中比较时,5-羟色胺去极化过程和非胆碱能e.p.s.p.过程中的膜电阻变化,以及它们对条件极化的各自反应均相似。在5-羟色胺诱导的去极化过程中,非胆碱能e.p.s.p.可逆性消失;当通过超极化电流使膜电位恢复到静息水平时,阻断仍持续存在。5-羟色胺拮抗剂赛庚啶(20-50微摩尔)可可逆性抑制5-羟色胺去极化以及非胆碱能e.p.s.p.,而5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂氟西汀(30-50微摩尔)则可增强之。另一方面,用5-羟色胺的前体L-色氨酸(50微摩尔)预处理神经节,可优先增强突触诱导反应。一部分神经元(15%)对P物质(1微摩尔)去极化,P物质也可使这些神经元中诱发的非胆碱能e.p.s.p.可逆性脱敏。其余神经元(25%)对5-羟色胺或P物质均不敏感,这些细胞中诱发的非胆碱能e.p.s.p.同样也不受这两种药物的明显影响。此外,赛庚啶、氟西汀和L-色氨酸对5-羟色胺不敏感的神经元中诱发的非胆碱能e.p.s.p.无显著影响。运用免疫荧光技术,可观察到许多腹腔神经节神经元周围有密集但分布不均的5-羟色胺免疫反应性神经纤维。在用过量5-羟色胺预吸收的抗血清孵育的神经节中未观察到免疫反应性。总的来说,我们的结果表明,5-羟色胺是本研究中所采样的约60%腹腔神经节神经元中诱发非胆碱能e.p.s.p.的递质,而在其余神经元中,缓慢去极化可能由P物质和/或某些未知递质产生。