Roeltgen D P, Heilman K M
Brain. 1984 Sep;107 ( Pt 3):811-27. doi: 10.1093/brain/107.3.811.
Eight patients with acquired agraphia were studied using the same writing tests and were compared with normal and brain-damaged controls. Four patients fulfilled the criteria for lexical agraphia and on CT scan had lesions of the posterior angular gyrus that spared the supramarginal gyrus. The other 4 fulfilled the criteria for phonological agraphia. They had lesions on CT scan that were similar to those found in previously described patients with phonological agraphia. Their lesions involved the supramarginal gyrus or insula deep to it and spared the angular gyrus. These studies support the hypothesis that there are two dissociable spelling systems and that these spelling systems are disrupted by focal lesions in separate but distinct brain regions. Further studies investigated the relationships between phonological agraphia and phonological dyslexia (alexia), and lexical agraphia and surface dyslexia (lexical alexia). The data support the hypothesis that individual systems subserve the four processes of phonological spelling, phonological reading, lexical spelling and lexical reading.
对8名获得性失写症患者进行了相同的书写测试,并与正常人和脑损伤对照者进行了比较。4名患者符合词汇性失写症的标准,CT扫描显示其角回后部有病变,缘上回未受影响。另外4名患者符合语音性失写症的标准。他们的CT扫描病变与先前描述的语音性失写症患者的病变相似。他们的病变累及缘上回或其深部的脑岛,角回未受影响。这些研究支持了这样一种假说,即存在两种可分离的拼写系统,并且这些拼写系统会被不同但明确的脑区中的局灶性病变所破坏。进一步的研究调查了语音性失写症与语音性诵读困难(失读症)之间的关系,以及词汇性失写症与表层诵读困难(词汇性失读症)之间的关系。数据支持了这样一种假说,即各个系统分别负责语音拼写、语音阅读、词汇拼写和词汇阅读这四个过程。