Suppr超能文献

侵入与持续现象。

Intrusions and perseverations.

作者信息

Shindler A G, Caplan L R, Hier D B

出版信息

Brain Lang. 1984 Sep;23(1):148-58. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(84)90013-0.

Abstract

Twenty-two subjects with presumed senile dementia of the Alzheimer's type (SDAT), twenty-two with dementia other than SDAT, twenty with aphasia, and seventeen healthy controls over 50 years of age were examined for intrusions and perseverations. Perseverations were defined as the immediate inappropriate repetition of a prior response whereas intrusions were defined as the inappropriate repetition of prior responses after intervening stimuli. Intrusions and perseverations occurred in demented and aphasic subjects, but were rare in controls. Intrusions occurred most often in SDAT or Wernicke aphasia, but also in dementia other than SDAT. Intrusions were not correlated with dementia severity. Intrusions are a useful sign of dementia, but they cannot be considered pathognomonic of SDAT. They appear to arise when subjects are unable to access correct responses from long-term memory and instead substitute erroneous responses selected from short-term memory. Perseverations were most common in the Wernicke aphasics and subjects with dementia due to communicating hydrocephalus. Although frontal lobe dysfunction is prominent in communicating hydrocephalus, it is absent in cases of Wernicke aphasia. Thus, we have confirmed prior suggestions that perseveration can occur in the absence of frontal lobe injury. Failure to self-monitor speech as well as an inability to change mental set probably plays an important role in the genesis of perseverations. There was no statistically significant correlation between dementia severity and number of perseverations. Low correlations were found between intrusions and perseverations suggesting that these seemingly similar behaviors are distinct and are probably produced by separate neuropsychological mechanisms.

摘要

对22名疑似阿尔茨海默型老年痴呆症(SDAT)患者、22名患有非SDAT型痴呆症的患者、20名失语症患者以及17名50岁以上的健康对照者进行了侵入和持续现象检查。持续现象被定义为对先前反应的立即不适当重复,而侵入现象被定义为在中间刺激后对先前反应的不适当重复。侵入和持续现象在痴呆症患者和失语症患者中出现,但在对照组中很少见。侵入现象最常出现在SDAT或韦尼克失语症患者中,但在非SDAT型痴呆症患者中也有出现。侵入现象与痴呆症严重程度无关。侵入现象是痴呆症的一个有用指标,但不能被视为SDAT的特征性表现。它们似乎是在受试者无法从长期记忆中获取正确反应,而是用从短期记忆中选择的错误反应来替代时出现的。持续现象在韦尼克失语症患者和因交通性脑积水导致痴呆的患者中最为常见。虽然额叶功能障碍在交通性脑积水中很突出,但在韦尼克失语症病例中并不存在。因此,我们证实了先前的观点,即持续现象可以在没有额叶损伤的情况下发生。无法自我监控言语以及无法改变思维定势可能在持续现象的发生中起重要作用。痴呆症严重程度与持续现象的数量之间没有统计学上的显著相关性。侵入现象和持续现象之间的相关性较低,这表明这些看似相似的行为是不同的,可能是由不同的神经心理学机制产生的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验