Nakane A, Minagawa T
Cell Immunol. 1984 Oct 1;88(1):29-40. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(84)90049-2.
Interferon (IFN)-alpha/beta was induced in the circulation of mice infected intravenously with Listeria monocytogenes 24 to 72 hr after infection, but was not induced by the administration of heat-killed Listeria, listerial cell wall fraction (LCWF), or listerial soluble fraction. Appearance of IFN-alpha/beta showed a pattern similar to that of the growth of bacteria in the spleen and the liver of mice. IFN-alpha/beta production was abrogated by pretreatment of mice with anti-asialo GM1 antibody, antithymocyte serum, or hydrocortisone, but not with cyclophosphamide or carrageenan. Such treatments which suppressed IFN-alpha/beta production did not influence bacterial growth in the organs of mice in the early stage of Listeria infection. Administration of IFN-alpha/beta exogenously also did not. After 5 days of infection when the specific resistance against reinfection with Listeria was established, IFN-gamma but not IFN-alpha/beta was induced in the circulation 3 to 6 hr after stimulation with LCWF or reinfection with Listeria. IFN-gamma production was abrogated completely by cyclophosphamide and antithymocyte serum, and partially by hydrocortisone and carrageenan, but not by anti-asialo GM1 antibody in Listeria-infected mice treated with these agents before induction of IFN-gamma by LCWF. Presumably, IFN-alpha/beta might be produced by asialo GM1-bearing cells but IFN-gamma might not. However, IFN-gamma production was suppressed in Listeria-infected mice, when IFN-alpha/beta production had been inhibited by treatment with anti-asialo GM1 antibody or when the IFN produced had been neutralized with anti-mouse IFN-alpha/beta antibody. Therefore, it is conceivable that IFN-alpha/beta might be essential for the generation or the expression of antigen-specific T cells involving IFN-gamma production and acquired resistance during Listeria infection. In fact, the bacterial growth in the organs of mice in the early stage of infection was normal in IFN-alpha/beta-depleted mice but it resulted in the delay of T-cell-dependent elimination of bacteria from the organs of mice in the late stage.
静脉注射感染单核细胞增生李斯特菌的小鼠,在感染后24至72小时,其循环系统中可诱导产生干扰素(IFN)-α/β,但热灭活的李斯特菌、李斯特菌细胞壁组分(LCWF)或李斯特菌可溶性组分的给药不会诱导产生。IFN-α/β的出现模式与小鼠脾脏和肝脏中细菌的生长模式相似。用抗去唾液酸GM1抗体、抗胸腺细胞血清或氢化可的松对小鼠进行预处理可消除IFN-α/β的产生,但环磷酰胺或角叉菜胶则不会。这些抑制IFN-α/β产生的处理在李斯特菌感染早期并不影响小鼠器官中的细菌生长。外源性给予IFN-α/β也不会。感染5天后,当建立起对再次感染李斯特菌的特异性抵抗力时,用LCWF刺激或再次感染李斯特菌后3至6小时,循环系统中诱导产生的是IFN-γ而非IFN-α/β。在由LCWF诱导IFN-γ之前用这些药物处理的李斯特菌感染小鼠中,环磷酰胺和抗胸腺细胞血清可完全消除IFN-γ的产生,氢化可的松和角叉菜胶可部分消除,而抗去唾液酸GM1抗体则不会。据推测,IFN-α/β可能由携带去唾液酸GM1的细胞产生,但IFN-γ可能不是。然而,在用抗去唾液酸GM1抗体处理抑制了IFN-α/β产生时,或用抗小鼠IFN-α/β抗体中和了产生的IFN时,则李斯特菌感染小鼠中的IFN-γ产生受到抑制。因此,可以想象,IFN-α/β对于李斯特菌感染期间涉及IFN-γ产生和获得性抵抗力的抗原特异性T细胞的产生或表达可能至关重要。事实上,在IFN-α/β缺失的小鼠中,感染早期小鼠器官中的细菌生长正常,但在后期会导致T细胞依赖性从小鼠器官中清除细菌的延迟。