Bystryn J C, Jacobsen J S, Liu P, Heaney-Kieras J
Hybridoma. 1982;1(4):465-72. doi: 10.1089/hyb.1.1982.1.465.
Melanoma-associated antigens (MAAs) recognized by murine monoclonal and rabbit polyclonal antibodies were compared. Two rabbit antimelanoma sera raised in our laboratory recognized five human cell-surface MAAs with approximate MWs of 75, 95, 120, 150, and 240 kd. These antigens were easily detected by SDS-PAGE of specific immunoprecipitates on a melanoma cell (HM31) which failed to reveal antigens reactive with the panel of murine monoclonal antibodies studied. By contrast, these five antigens could not be detected on another melanoma cell (SK-MEL-28), which was reactive with several of the murine monoclonals. These results suggest that the MAAs recognized by rabbit and murine antibodies are different and imply that the antigens which are immunogeneic in man may not necessarily be immunogeneic in mice.
对鼠单克隆抗体和兔多克隆抗体识别的黑色素瘤相关抗原(MAA)进行了比较。在我们实验室制备的两种兔抗黑色素瘤血清识别出五种人细胞表面MAA,其近似分子量分别为75、95、120、150和240kd。通过对黑色素瘤细胞(HM31)上特异性免疫沉淀产物进行SDS-PAGE,很容易检测到这些抗原,而所研究的一组鼠单克隆抗体未能检测到与之反应的抗原。相比之下,在另一种与几种鼠单克隆抗体反应的黑色素瘤细胞(SK-MEL-28)上未能检测到这五种抗原。这些结果表明,兔抗体和鼠抗体识别的MAA不同,这意味着在人类中具有免疫原性的抗原在小鼠中不一定具有免疫原性。