Petersen J K, Krogsgaard J, Nielsen K M, Nørgaard E B
Int J Oral Surg. 1984 Oct;13(5):406-10. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(84)80066-6.
Oxidized, regenerated cellulose (Surgicel) and gelatin sponge (Spongostan) were packed in the sockets of upper third molars after surgical removal in 10 and 11 patients, respectively. The other side in each patient functioned as control. The study revealed that more pain was apparent on the sides, where the materials were packed, especially in the gelatin sponge group, although more patients preferred this material to oxidized, regenerated cellulose. The 2 materials did not differ with regard to swelling or bleeding. No complications were encountered. Use of these materials in post-extraction sockets did not seem to impair closure of the wound as estimated by epithelial cover of the sockets, although healing was slightly delayed in the gelatin group.
分别在10例和11例患者拔除上颌第三磨牙后,将氧化再生纤维素(速即纱)和明胶海绵(海绵斯坦)填充于拔牙窝。每位患者的另一侧作为对照。研究显示,填充材料侧疼痛更明显,尤其是明胶海绵组,尽管更多患者更喜欢这种材料而非氧化再生纤维素。两种材料在肿胀或出血方面无差异。未出现并发症。根据拔牙窝的上皮覆盖情况估计,在拔牙后牙槽窝使用这些材料似乎并未妨碍伤口闭合,尽管明胶组愈合稍有延迟。