Suppr超能文献

两种可吸收止血剂的比较:明胶海绵(海绵斯坦)和氧化再生纤维素(速即纱)。

A comparison between 2 absorbable hemostatic agents: gelatin sponge (Spongostan) and oxidized regenerated cellulose (Surgicel).

作者信息

Petersen J K, Krogsgaard J, Nielsen K M, Nørgaard E B

出版信息

Int J Oral Surg. 1984 Oct;13(5):406-10. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(84)80066-6.

Abstract

Oxidized, regenerated cellulose (Surgicel) and gelatin sponge (Spongostan) were packed in the sockets of upper third molars after surgical removal in 10 and 11 patients, respectively. The other side in each patient functioned as control. The study revealed that more pain was apparent on the sides, where the materials were packed, especially in the gelatin sponge group, although more patients preferred this material to oxidized, regenerated cellulose. The 2 materials did not differ with regard to swelling or bleeding. No complications were encountered. Use of these materials in post-extraction sockets did not seem to impair closure of the wound as estimated by epithelial cover of the sockets, although healing was slightly delayed in the gelatin group.

摘要

分别在10例和11例患者拔除上颌第三磨牙后,将氧化再生纤维素(速即纱)和明胶海绵(海绵斯坦)填充于拔牙窝。每位患者的另一侧作为对照。研究显示,填充材料侧疼痛更明显,尤其是明胶海绵组,尽管更多患者更喜欢这种材料而非氧化再生纤维素。两种材料在肿胀或出血方面无差异。未出现并发症。根据拔牙窝的上皮覆盖情况估计,在拔牙后牙槽窝使用这些材料似乎并未妨碍伤口闭合,尽管明胶组愈合稍有延迟。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验