Nilsson G E, Otto U, Wahlberg J E
Contact Dermatitis. 1982 Nov;8(6):401-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1982.tb04266.x.
It is desirable to use more objective methods than visual scoring for the assessment of skin irritancy reactions. In the present study the blood flow in skin sites exposed to sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) was recorded by a laser Doppler flowmeter. The irritant was applied to the volar forearm of healthy volunteers in concentrations ranging from 0.001% to 5% under occlusion for 24 h. The test sites were scored visually and the blood flow was recorded at 3 different times: 26 h, 48 h and 72 h after the application of SLS. Approximately 950 recordings were performed and a clear relationship was observed between the applied doses of SLS, the recorded blood flow values and the corresponding scores. In a few cases a deviation from the general trend was observed, implying that the naked eye might be unreliable for the assessment of skin irritancy reactions.
对于皮肤刺激性反应的评估,使用比视觉评分更客观的方法是可取的。在本研究中,通过激光多普勒血流仪记录暴露于月桂醇硫酸酯钠(SLS)的皮肤部位的血流。将刺激物以0.001%至5%的浓度涂覆于健康志愿者的掌侧前臂,封闭24小时。对测试部位进行视觉评分,并在涂抹SLS后的3个不同时间点(26小时、48小时和72小时)记录血流。共进行了约950次记录,观察到SLS的施用剂量、记录的血流值和相应评分之间存在明显关系。在少数情况下,观察到偏离总体趋势的情况,这意味着肉眼评估皮肤刺激性反应可能不可靠。