Murphy M L, Thenabadu P N, de Soyza N, Doherty J E, Baker B J
Am J Cardiol. 1983 Aug;52(3):381-3. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(83)90143-1.
Left atrial (LA) abnormality determined from precordial lead V1 was assessed by 2 observers as a criterion of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy in the presence of right bundle branch block (BBB) in 23 patients. The presence of LV hypertrophy was confirmed from a postmortem cardiac partition technique and defined at 2 levels of confidence: probable and definite hypertrophy. Observers reliably differentiated between the hypertrophied and normal-sized ventricle in the presence of right BBB by using LA abnormality as an electrocardiographic criterion. When defined as definite hypertrophy, observer 1 correctly identified LV hypertrophy in 78% of the cases and observer 2 in 67% of the cases. False-positive results were present in 21% of cases by observer 1 and 14% by observer 2. Comparable results were achieved when a definition of probable hypertrophy was used. Observer performance of recognition of LA abnormality in this study was satisfactory with 91% agreement between observers. Our results are comparable and in some instances superior to conventional criteria commonly recommended to diagnose LV hypertrophy on the electrocardiogram without right BBB.
由心前区导联V1判定的左心房(LA)异常,由两名观察者评估,作为23例存在右束支传导阻滞(BBB)患者左心室(LV)肥厚的一项标准。LV肥厚的存在通过死后心脏分割技术得以证实,并在两个置信水平上定义:可能肥厚和确定肥厚。观察者通过将LA异常作为心电图标准,在存在右束支传导阻滞的情况下,可靠地区分了肥厚心室和正常大小的心室。当定义为确定肥厚时,观察者1在78%的病例中正确识别出LV肥厚,观察者2在67%的病例中正确识别出LV肥厚。观察者1有21%的病例出现假阳性结果,观察者2有14%的病例出现假阳性结果。当使用可能肥厚的定义时,也取得了类似的结果。本研究中观察者对LA异常的识别表现令人满意,观察者之间的一致性为91%。我们的结果具有可比性,在某些情况下优于通常推荐的用于在无右束支传导阻滞时诊断心电图LV肥厚的传统标准。