Edwards W
Clin Ther. 1983;5(5):495-503.
Etodolac, aspirin, and placebo were evaluated for efficacy and safety in 18 patients with adult-onset, active rheumatoid arthritis. This was a 12-week, double-blind, parallel-group study divided into drug titration and maintenance periods and preceded by a washout period of up to two weeks. The mean daily maintenance doses of etodolac and aspirin were 394 mg and 4,414 mg, respectively. Etodolac was significantly (P less than or equal to 0.05) more effective than placebo in five of ten clinical variables of efficacy: number of painful joints, number of swollen joints, pain intensity, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and patients' overall assessments. Aspirin was significantly more effective than placebo in only two assessments: number of painful joints and pain intensity. One patient on etodolac, two patients on aspirin, and four patients on placebo had to be withdrawn from the trial because of insufficient therapeutic response. One patient in the placebo group was withdrawn from the study because of a pruritic rash. Mild to moderate gastrointestinal complaints occurred in all three treatment groups: in three patients taking etodolac, three taking aspirin, and two taking placebo.
对依托度酸、阿司匹林和安慰剂在18例成年起病的活动性类风湿性关节炎患者中进行了疗效和安全性评估。这是一项为期12周的双盲平行组研究,分为药物滴定期和维持期,之前有长达两周的洗脱期。依托度酸和阿司匹林的平均每日维持剂量分别为394毫克和4414毫克。在十个疗效临床变量中的五个方面,依托度酸比安慰剂显著更有效(P小于或等于0.05):疼痛关节数、肿胀关节数、疼痛强度、红细胞沉降率和患者的总体评估。阿司匹林仅在两个评估方面比安慰剂显著更有效:疼痛关节数和疼痛强度。由于治疗反应不足,一名服用依托度酸的患者、两名服用阿司匹林的患者和四名服用安慰剂的患者不得不退出试验。安慰剂组的一名患者因瘙痒性皮疹退出研究。所有三个治疗组均出现轻度至中度胃肠道不适:三名服用依托度酸的患者、三名服用阿司匹林的患者和两名服用安慰剂的患者。