Suppr超能文献

下背痛患者中MMPI-R型与MMPI-168剖面图的比较分析

Comparative analysis of MMPI form R and MMPI-168 profiles in low back pain patients.

作者信息

Harasymiw S J, McKian P M, Herz G I

出版信息

Scand J Rehabil Med. 1983;15(3):147-53.

PMID:6227079
Abstract

This study investigated the efficacy of MMPI Form R in evaluating chronic low back pain patients. Ninety-seven males and 81 females were administered Form R during a pre-treatment evaluation. Each test was scored for Form R and MMPI-168. Scales Pa and Sc were re-scored following a modified conversion table discussed in the literature, resulting in three scores for Pa and Sc. Correlations were calculated between scales on the two forms plus modified conversions for scales Pa and Sc. Highly significant correlations were found between the two forms of the MMPI, with slightly lower correlations between modified Pa and Sc scales and the same scales on Form R. Although there were statistical differences between MMPI Form R and MMPI-168 profile elevations, these were not considered clinically significant. Because of the high intercorrelations, and the test length it seems possible to consider use of the MMPI-168 in screening chronic pain patients. Other hypotheses exploring sex differences and differential profile elevations were investigated and are discussed.

摘要

本研究调查了明尼苏达多相人格问卷修订版(MMPI Form R)在评估慢性下背痛患者方面的有效性。在治疗前评估期间,对97名男性和81名女性进行了MMPI Form R测试。对每份测试的MMPI Form R和MMPI - 168进行评分。根据文献中讨论的修改后的转换表对量表Pa和Sc重新评分,得出Pa和Sc的三个分数。计算了两种问卷形式的量表之间以及量表Pa和Sc的修改转换分数之间的相关性。发现MMPI的两种形式之间存在高度显著的相关性,而修改后的Pa和Sc量表与MMPI Form R上的相同量表之间的相关性略低。尽管MMPI Form R和MMPI - 168剖面图高度之间存在统计学差异,但这些差异在临床上不被认为具有显著意义。由于相关性高,且测试长度较短,似乎可以考虑使用MMPI - 168来筛查慢性疼痛患者。还研究并讨论了探索性别差异和剖面图高度差异的其他假设。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验