• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一致性评级在区分器质性和功能性下腰痛中的价值。

Value of consensual ratings in differentiating organic and functional low back pain.

作者信息

Donham G W, Mikhail S F, Meyers R

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1984 Mar;40(2):432-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198403)40:2<432::aid-jclp2270400208>3.0.co;2-s.

DOI:10.1002/1097-4679(198403)40:2<432::aid-jclp2270400208>3.0.co;2-s
PMID:6233303
Abstract

Evaluated 40 low back pain patients by a multidisciplinary team (orthopedic surgeons, nursing staff and a medical psychologist) to identify the behavioral characteristics associated with functional and organic determinants of pain. Significant relationships were found between orthopedists' clinical judgments and higher scores on MMPI scales F, HS, and MA, between nurses' ratings and higher scores on MMPI scales D, PA, PT, and SI, and on the Zung Depression Scale and STAI Trait-Anxiety scale. Physicians and nurses consensually agreed on 27 cases. Behavioral observations of the orthopedists and the nursing staff revealed contrasting patterns of behavior for those patients classified as organic or functional. The power of the consensual rating method and its usefulness in clinical appraisals were discussed.

摘要

一个多学科团队(骨科医生、护理人员和医学心理学家)对40名腰痛患者进行了评估,以确定与疼痛的功能和器质性决定因素相关的行为特征。研究发现,骨科医生的临床判断与明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)中F、HS和MA量表得分较高之间存在显著关系,护士的评分与MMPI中D、PA、PT和SI量表得分较高之间,以及与zung抑郁量表和状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)得分较高之间存在显著关系。医生和护士在27例病例上达成了共识。骨科医生和护理人员的行为观察显示,对于那些被归类为器质性或功能性的患者,其行为模式形成了对比。文中讨论了共识评级方法的效力及其在临床评估中的有用性。

相似文献

1
Value of consensual ratings in differentiating organic and functional low back pain.一致性评级在区分器质性和功能性下腰痛中的价值。
J Clin Psychol. 1984 Mar;40(2):432-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198403)40:2<432::aid-jclp2270400208>3.0.co;2-s.
2
Validity of a back pain classification scale for detecting psychological disturbance as measured by the MMPI.一种用于检测心理障碍的背痛分类量表的效度,该心理障碍通过明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)进行测量。
J Clin Psychol. 1980 Jan;36(1):186-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198001)36:1<186::aid-jclp2270360122>3.0.co;2-e.
3
Differences between functional versus organic low back pain patients.功能性与器质性下背痛患者之间的差异。
Pain. 1977 Oct;4(1):73-78. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(77)90089-6.
4
Rorschach and pain characteristics of patients with low back pain and "conversion V" MMPI profiles.
J Pers Assess. 1982 Feb;46(1):18-25. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4601_5.
5
Chronic low back pain and depression.慢性腰痛与抑郁
J Clin Psychol. 1983 Jul;39(4):486-93. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198307)39:4<486::aid-jclp2270390405>3.0.co;2-r.
6
Psychological and social correlates of the back pain classification scale.背痛分类量表的心理和社会相关因素。
J Pers Assess. 1983 Feb;47(1):60-5. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4701_7.
7
The value of the MMPI conversion 'V' in the assessment of psychogenic pain.明尼苏达多相人格调查表转换值“V”在心理性疼痛评估中的价值。
J Psychosom Res. 1985;29(2):125-31. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(85)90033-9.
8
A review of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) with low back pain patients.对明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)在腰痛患者中的应用综述。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1982 Dec;5(4):171-7.
9
The MMPI as a predictor of response to conservative treatment for low back pain.
J Clin Psychol. 1979 Apr;35(2):278-84. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197904)35:2<278::aid-jclp2270350211>3.0.co;2-1.
10
Personality organization as an aspect of back pain in a medical setting.在医疗环境中,人格组织作为背痛的一个方面。
J Pers Assess. 1978 Apr;42(2):152-7. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4202_7.