Suppr超能文献

抑郁症比较结局研究中的患者流失。一份随访报告。

Patient attrition in a comparative outcome study of depression. A follow-up report.

作者信息

Simons A D, Levine J L, Lustman P J, Murphy G E

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 1984 Apr;6(2):163-73. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(84)90021-1.

Abstract

Eighty-seven moderately to severely depressed psychiatric outpatients were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of cognitive therapy (n = 24), pharmacotherapy (n = 24), cognitive therapy plus pharmacotherapy (n = 22) or cognitive therapy plus active placebo (n = 17). Seventy patients completed the treatment protocol; 17 dropped out before the end of the treatment period. Completers and dropouts did not differ at pretreatment on demographic variables, measures of depression, cognitive functioning or social adjustment. Sixteen of the 17 patients who dropped out were followed up and interviewed to assess their clinical status and reasons for discontinuing treatment. Neither group remained depressed at follow-up. Practical matters and issues related to the type of treatment received seemed to contribute most to patients' decision to drop out. Patients assigned to the combination therapies were more likely to complete the research protocol than those assigned to single treatment modalities. These findings are discussed in terms of their implications for clinical practice and outcome research.

摘要

87名中度至重度抑郁的精神科门诊患者被随机分为四组,分别接受为期12周的认知疗法(n = 24)、药物疗法(n = 24)、认知疗法加药物疗法(n = 22)或认知疗法加活性安慰剂(n = 17)。70名患者完成了治疗方案;17名患者在治疗期结束前退出。完成治疗者和退出者在治疗前的人口统计学变量、抑郁测量、认知功能或社会适应方面没有差异。对17名退出患者中的16名进行了随访和访谈,以评估他们的临床状况和停止治疗的原因。随访时两组均未再处于抑郁状态。实际问题以及与所接受治疗类型相关的问题似乎是患者决定退出的主要原因。分配到联合治疗组的患者比分配到单一治疗方式组的患者更有可能完成研究方案。将根据这些发现对临床实践和结果研究的影响进行讨论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验