• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知疗法与药物疗法。单独及联合用于治疗抑郁症。

Cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy. Singly and together in the treatment of depression.

作者信息

Murphy G E, Simons A D, Wetzel R D, Lustman P J

出版信息

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984 Jan;41(1):33-41. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1984.01790120037006.

DOI:10.1001/archpsyc.1984.01790120037006
PMID:6691783
Abstract

Eight-seven moderately to severely depressed psychiatric outpatients were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of cognitive therapy (CT) (n = 24), pharmacotherapy (n = 24), CT plus pharmacotherapy (n = 22), or CT plus active placebo (n = 17). Seventy patients completed the treatment protocol. Seventeen dropped out before the end of the treatment period. Patients who completed treatment showed significant improvement in mean scores on two common measures of severity of depression (the Beck Depression Inventory and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression) between evaluation and termination. Improvement did not differ as a function of the different treatment modalities. Inclusion of dropout patients' end-point scores did not alter these results. Treatment gains in all groups were maintained at one-month follow-up assessment. A portion of this study replicated an earlier study. While the results were not identical, they indicated that either CT or antidepressant drug treatment can be effective in treating outpatients with primary, nonbipolar depression of moderate or greater severity. Combining treatments did not lead either to additive effects or negative interactions.

摘要

八十七名中度至重度抑郁的精神科门诊患者被随机分配接受为期12周的认知疗法(CT)(n = 24)、药物治疗(n = 24)、CT联合药物治疗(n = 22)或CT联合活性安慰剂治疗(n = 17)。七十名患者完成了治疗方案。十七名患者在治疗期结束前退出。完成治疗的患者在评估和治疗结束之间,在两项常见的抑郁严重程度测量指标(贝克抑郁量表和汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表)上的平均得分有显著改善。改善情况不因不同的治疗方式而有所不同。纳入退出患者的终点分数并未改变这些结果。所有组的治疗效果在1个月的随访评估中得以维持。本研究的一部分重复了一项早期研究。虽然结果并不完全相同,但表明CT或抗抑郁药物治疗均可有效治疗中度或更严重的原发性非双相抑郁门诊患者。联合治疗既未产生相加效应,也未产生负面相互作用。

相似文献

1
Cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy. Singly and together in the treatment of depression.认知疗法与药物疗法。单独及联合用于治疗抑郁症。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984 Jan;41(1):33-41. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1984.01790120037006.
2
The process of change in cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy for depression. Changes in mood and cognition.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984 Jan;41(1):45-51. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1984.01790120049007.
3
Cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy for depression. Sustained improvement over one year.抑郁症的认知疗法与药物疗法。一年以上的持续改善。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1986 Jan;43(1):43-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800010045006.
4
Treatment of depression with cognitive therapy and amitriptyline.认知疗法和阿米替林治疗抑郁症
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985 Feb;42(2):142-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790250036005.
5
Patient attrition in a comparative outcome study of depression. A follow-up report.抑郁症比较结局研究中的患者流失。一份随访报告。
J Affect Disord. 1984 Apr;6(2):163-73. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(84)90021-1.
6
Cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy for depression. Singly and in combination.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992 Oct;49(10):774-81. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820100018004.
7
Patient predictors of response to psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy: findings in the NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program.心理治疗和药物治疗反应的患者预测因素:美国国立精神卫生研究所抑郁症治疗协作研究项目的研究结果
Am J Psychiatry. 1991 Aug;148(8):997-1008. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.8.997.
8
Severity of depression and response to cognitive behavior therapy.
Am J Psychiatry. 1991 Jun;148(6):784-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.6.784.
9
Combined pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy in the acute and continuation treatment of elderly patients with recurrent major depression: a preliminary report.联合药物治疗与心理治疗用于老年复发性重度抑郁症患者的急性期和延续期治疗:初步报告
Am J Psychiatry. 1992 Dec;149(12):1687-92. doi: 10.1176/ajp.149.12.1687.
10
Treatment of bereavement-related major depressive episodes in later life: a controlled study of acute and continuation treatment with nortriptyline and interpersonal psychotherapy.晚年丧亲相关重度抑郁发作的治疗:一项关于去甲替林与人际心理治疗急性及延续性治疗的对照研究
Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Feb;156(2):202-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.2.202.

引用本文的文献

1
Beneficial and harmful effects of tricyclic antidepressants for adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.三环类抗抑郁药治疗成人重性抑郁障碍的有益和有害作用:系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
BMJ Ment Health. 2024 Jan 22;27(1):e300730. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300730.
2
Clinical characteristics and potential association to Parkinson's disease and dementia with Lewy bodies in patients with major depressive disorder who received maintenance electroconvulsive therapy: a retrospective chart review study.维持性电抽搐治疗的重性抑郁障碍患者的临床特征及与帕金森病和路易体痴呆的潜在关联:一项回顾性图表研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 11;23(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04743-7.
3
Cost-Utility of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Unipolar Depression: A Markov Model Simulation.基于互联网的认知行为疗法治疗单相抑郁症的成本-效用:马尔可夫模型模拟。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Aug;18(4):567-578. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00551-x.
4
A network meta-analysis of the effects of psychotherapies, pharmacotherapies and their combination in the treatment of adult depression.心理治疗、药物治疗及其联合应用对成人抑郁症治疗效果的网状Meta分析。
World Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;19(1):92-107. doi: 10.1002/wps.20701.
5
The symptom-specific efficacy of antidepressant medication vs. cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of depression: results from an individual patient data meta-analysis.抗抑郁药物与认知行为疗法治疗抑郁症的症状特异性疗效:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析的结果
World Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;18(2):183-191. doi: 10.1002/wps.20630.
6
Translating the BDI and BDI-II into the HAMD and vice versa with equipercentile linking.用等百分位链接将 BDI 和 BDI-II 翻译成 HAMD 及反之。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Mar 14;29:e24. doi: 10.1017/S2045796019000088.
7
Predictors and Patterns of Psychiatric Treatment Dropout During Pregnancy Among Low-Income Women.低收入女性孕期精神科治疗中断的预测因素及模式
Matern Child Health J. 2018 Feb;22(2):226-236. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2394-9.
8
Comparative Effectiveness of Cognitive Therapy and Dynamic Psychotherapy for Major Depressive Disorder in a Community Mental Health Setting: A Randomized Clinical Noninferiority Trial.社区心理健康环境中认知疗法与动力心理疗法治疗重度抑郁症的比较效果:一项随机临床非劣效性试验
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Sep 1;73(9):904-11. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.1720.
9
Does Publication Bias Inflate the Apparent Efficacy of Psychological Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of US National Institutes of Health-Funded Trials.发表偏倚是否夸大了重度抑郁症心理治疗的表面疗效?对美国国立卫生研究院资助试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 30;10(9):e0137864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137864. eCollection 2015.
10
Comparative effectiveness of cognitive and dynamic therapies for major depressive disorder in a community mental health setting: study protocol for a randomized non-inferiority trial.社区心理健康环境中认知和动力治疗对重度抑郁症的疗效比较:一项随机非劣效性试验的研究方案。
BMC Psychol. 2014 Nov 11;2(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s40359-014-0047-y. eCollection 2014.